More US troops into Iraq..???

Question

IF George W Bush is even considering sending in 30-40,000 US troops into Iraq, why..

a) doesn't he re-focus his mind onto sending at least 10,000 of those additional troops BACK to AFGHANISTAN to replace some of the 77% of US troops he withdrew after succeeding in getting UK military help of troops on the ground to fight the REAL "war on terror" in AFGHANISTAN.. NOT Iraq - contrary to popular belief today !

b) why doesn't Tony Bliar (sic) have the courage to withdraw 77% of UK troops out of AFGHANISTAN so they can have some MUCH needed rest due to being so grossly under-manned and under-resourced, should his mate George W Bush go ahead with his advisors plans to augment US troop numbers in Iraq leaving UK troops to return home in body bags whilst trying valiantly to sort out the mess it has been placed in by its own UK Govt.?

Answer 1

If we pull out right now, the Iraqi governement can't do anything to stop the insurgents(sectarian violence/civil war depending on your PoV) and they might overtrhow the government. So we have to go back there again to fix the problem again. You should say we shouldn't have invaded Iraq anyway.

Answer 2

I only hope it works, I am going to withhold my decision if it was a good idea until after it happens. It really don't make sense to me because the more troops the more terrorist there will be, there is a never ending supply of them in the world. But we needed to change course as the one we are on is failing, I am willing to see Bush try anything that is essentially different then what is going on right now. Between you and me I do have doubt as to whether more troops will make it better, it didn't in Vietnam.

Answer 3

When do we say enough people have died for nothing?, this is the same stupid position America took in Vietnam.

America could commit its entire Army , all it will end up with is pointless deaths , just in greater numbers.

40,000 more troop sis just 40,000 more reasons for Iraq to become a civil war with America in the middle.

Answer 4

My warhat suggestion change into easily to help the nato project extra, yet inspite of the indisputable fact that that could want to signify extra nato deaths :) yet i change into easily instructed the idea 'is merely being thrown round' and is not finalized. i in my opinion am a bypass abode massive strategist. and picture that the warfare is inaccurate over budgeted and oppresive quite than conventional or helpful. after I say the warfare I recommend the middle East Theatre. the real rationalization for the warfare looks to relax contained in the minds of NATO command and doubtless diverse cabinets of Coalition governments. for sure it must be benificial to them not right now for inspite of reason. Manpower is getting used yet there seems a push to improve (atleast contained in the historic past) the length of the protection stress, to handle operational stresses. you'll discover this with calls in Canada for recruitment drives, contained in the U. S. with heavy use of reservist forces, and contained in the united kingdom??? i'm not particular about that inspite of the indisputable fact that the princes are even set to be placed distant places, Henry already is that if i'm not incorrect. So it style of feels contained in the minds of those governments to improve protection stress service. it is a backdrop to great downsizing. the reason of this in a cutting-edge context seems as a thanks to emphasize overthrows of governments not ruled with a imperative authorities in a 'nationwide' zone, besides as those imperative authorities which in most cases merely arn't loved. there are a good number of conflicts and NATO international places look putting their fingers in maximum all of them with some cases that it would not look the case (those round china). yet afghanastan is getting fairly close. There seems sturdy help for India, even inspite of the indisputable fact that there are different subject matters. It merely seems operations after Yugoslavia.. they're doing away with those they don't like, apparently only for that reason. Axis of Evil - or marks of earth. this is NATO - who is going to attempt to end NATO? are you able to end NATO - it truly is a loose shoot... it ain't very nearly communists anymore it truly is about communists and muslims. France on my own can't dodge NATO global domination.. it willl take the blended might want to of the French, Russians, and chinese language.With american air skill for sure.

Answer 5

Send all the TROOPS and DUPES ya want...there are millions of Muslims and AK 47's are dirt cheap.

Bring it on say GEORGE BUSH.......those MOOSELUMS are LOVIN IT....they love EXACTLY what we are doing....great target practice...lotsa fun..send more TROOPS...come on America

Answer 6

If we put more troops in, we risk more troops.

If we pull-out we don't risk our troops

What would you do?

I say pull out and let them use there own police and military.