Why do so many continue to believe Darwin's mistake?

Question

Evolution is not real science. It is philosophy. The philosophy of atheists. The scientific method cannot prove evolution. There is no experiment that can prove it, like there is for gravity.

Darwin used micro-evolution or development within species to invent macro-evoluion or development from one species to another.
Macro-evolution is impossible. An offspring cannot have an organ that did not exist in the parent.
DNA and modern science proves that evolution is impossible.
How many agree?

No Christian can believe in darwinian evolution and God at the same time. Evolution was invented as junk science to destroy religion.

You people need to do some research on the difference between micro-evolution and macro-evolution. Macro is impossible. Evolution is the dominant paradigm and most scientists live in confusion about macro-evolution.

This can be explained by the book :The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn .

Evolution also asserts one life form can change into another, higher form - something also never observed and thus unscientific. Instead, we always observe exactly what Genesis states numerous times: Life reproduces "according to its kind," i.e., cats beget cats, crickets beget crickets, etc. They never change into something else.

Anime Nut: the story of the snake and the apple is true, but it is an allegory.

Answer 1

you have obviously spent ZERO time reading anything about evolution other than worthless creationist propaganda.
PS-gravity is just as much of a theory as evolution, and there are many scientists out there who believe that the laws of gravity are not applicable throughout the universe. You OBVIOUSLY have NO education on the matter.

Anyone who agrees with you, just like you, IS WRONG...plain and simple you are wrong.


Since you are so smart, then maybe you can explain to me why OVER SEVENTY people have won a Nobel prize for their work on evolution, and yet not ONE SINGLE creationist has ever won a single award for their work in creationism from a respected scientific organization? Maybe you can explain why THOUSANDS of universities offer courses on evolution, and NONE on creationism? Maybe you can explain to me why evolution is accepted by over 99.8% of biologists as fact?


Look, you can say that macro-evolution is impossible, and you can repeatedly post this in your updates, but unless you are going to offer some source for this nonsense, then shut up already.

If you want proof of transitional fossils, here. If you can understand it....For every ONE source that you can produce saying that evolution is false, I can produce TWENTY FIVE (minimum), saying it is true.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html

Answer 2

Let's see how many ways you're wrong.

Evolution meets all criteria to be a scientific discipline.
Darwin was not an atheist.
Evolution has been demonstated in numerous experiments relying on scientific method.
No proposed mechanism for gravity has been demonstrated (unlike evolution).
Darwin discussed development of organs ("macro-evolution"), as well as the smaller scale changes that result in new organs.
New organs can arise from existing strucures over time.
DNA and all modern science (unless by "modern science" you mean "in my opinion") support (not PROVE, and definitely not PROVES) evolution.

Natural pholosophy is science. You made eight assertions and you got one right (by luck, since it is clear you do not understand the relationship between philosophy and science). To top it off, the only statement you got right was followed by a sentence fragment. Seven factual and two grammatical errors in eight assertions. That's more errors than assertions.

Answer 3

Actually, 9 scientists were all discovering evolution at the same time. I won't get into the details, because it is obvious you know nothing about science.

Modern science?
30 years ago around 70% of scientists were evolutionists.
Today, over 95% are evolutionists.

I really think you need to check your facts.

Micro evolution hardly needs study, you have no idea about macro-evolution if you think it is not possible. It is where the majority of the evidence and study from science has come from, there is thousands of pieces of evidence. But I guess you are smarter than the 95% of scientists who dedicate their lives to the subject.

EDIT: LMAO, we have plenty of animal transitional fossils, and the reason we don't find more is perfectly clear. Do you think a cat is going to birth a bird? Do you know how slow the process of the forces of evolution are. Lol, you're funny.

Answer 4

As far as micro-evolution vs macro-evolution goes, how many 'micro' changes does it take before a species is no longer a species? Note that it's thought the Grand Canyon was carved out by a very tiny amount of water dripping for a long, long, long period of time. How does this relate to evolution? I'll let you make that connection.

Answer 5

Their has been information, in labratories their have been infinite controlled breeding experiments proving evolution. Scientists gets small organisms that reproduce rapidly and set some variety of parameter, which ninety 9.9% of the time they evolve with the aid of organic decision to evolve to despite the parameter grew to become into. the element is that macro and micro evolution are truly a similar element. An organism that mutated to have an common, possibly a million or 2 celled, organ this is sensible could have offspring and a few of them could mutate to have that organ boost making the organ much greater suitable. it somewhat is been shown that a species will evolve with the aid of organic decision with the aid of truly slow small steps, at last ultimate to a reasonably distinctive version of a similar species. those differences will proceed and wether or no longer you want to call them micro or macro evolution. DNA through no skill disproves evolution, it surely helps it. Mutations in DNA that are beneficial will enable an organism to proceed to exist and reproduce. As for evolution nonetheless being a thought, the assumption of gravity continues to be a thought. All a thought is is a end of a variety of of information. information and theories surely artwork with one yet another, no longer against.

Answer 6

"DNA and modern science proves that evolution is impossible."

Damn! DNA is what makes evolution possible, it is the very thing that mixes up the genetics of a population and allows for mutation and speciation to occur. By the way, nothing is impossible, only improbable. And with enough time, say billions of years, improbable things become certainties. If you played the lottery every week for a billion years you'd win the jackpot several times. Oh right, the earth is only 6000 years old, I forgot ;). If you don't understand the concept of probability, you need to retake high school math.

Answer 7

How do you explain dinosaur bones? Whales & dolphins which still have remnants of legs? Walking catfish, which can breathe out of water? The fact that birds' wings & reptiles' scales are of the same material? And last, but by no means least, the fact that you, and all humans have a coccyx (tail bone)? ........Now, prove it didn't take place. I'm not an atheist. I'm an agnostic, because I can't prove God does or does not exist either way.

Answer 8

Evolution has been confirmed by 150 years of science since Darwin's initial theory. New information has made modifications to his theory, but the original basis still explains the evidence better than anything else.

You've just displayed a near total ignorance of the subject. If I were you, I would be ashamed of myself for posting such tripe in public.

Please tell me: what natural process stops evolution at the "micro" level? Once evolution is in motion, why would it cease?

Answer 9

you obviously did your research at church,the answer to your question is a thing called evidence,not just some elaborate lie made up by a little girl that said she didnt have sex because she didnt want to get into trouble, and got pregnant from a invisible man,the funny part is that people actually buy inot that crap,now thats funny, no millions of pieces of hard proof,millions, bones in various stages of evolution using fail proof carbon dating thats extremely accurate, evolution of animals, evolution of trees,adaptation of the plants and trees,come on get a grip, and research use your head,just because the crackhead says crack heals your pains,it doesnt mean to go smoke crack,you know that its ridiculous,pat robertson said that he talked to old JC himself and was told that us soil will be attacked, well duh,that took a brain surgeon to figure out,dont be impressioned by others use logic and research, you will find the answers for yourself

Answer 10

You do realize that if any scientist out there were to prove that evolution of species is impossible, he would win fame, fortune, money and awards all over the place, and it would be one of the greatest scientific developments of our generation, right? Why are none of them taking advantage of that opportunity, if everything you say is correct?