2007-01-05 10:58:56 · 23 answers · asked by Ahwell 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
In an ideal world Yes...but the Police cant even say ..here boy ... to anyone...they couldnt even make their minds up wether to charge the owner with anything.. Anyone who has a slabbering backside licking animal like that in their home is mental...and should be put down along with the dog,,
2007-01-05 11:02:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
TO go down the road of actually disposing of the owner along with this beast from hell is probably a reaction that would find favour with a lot of people i personally would withold judgement but i feel very strongly that these so called dogs need to be eradicated from our society completely without reserve and anyone openly flaunting these beasts in public or kept as a status symbol should be dealt with / with the full rigour of the law exposed and imprisoned
2007-01-05 12:27:18 · answer #2 · answered by GEORGE M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dogs are there to be trained. Its the owner who is responsible. Bring back a charge of £ 50 per year for a dog licence. Shot the owner he wouldn't feel it. loking at him this week AnnB I don't think he gives a dam.
2007-01-06 10:35:15 · answer #3 · answered by deadly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shooting the owner will not stop the heartache of the little girls family. He should be banned from keeping animals for life,be sent to prison for a long time and educated on how much torchure and heartache he has caused because he ignored warnings about his dog and due to his selfish and stubborn behavior, a little innocent girl has tragically lost her life.
But i do see where people are coming from about shooting the owner.But i won't chanmge things will it.
2007-01-05 22:02:02 · answer #4 · answered by big g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the person used the dog to intentionally hurt the child, then yes. If not, no we should not shoot the owner. I am in favor of the death penalty, but not for someone's personal dog mauling a child. They should be criminally charged with something else.
2007-01-05 11:34:02 · answer #5 · answered by deftonehead778 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah did you see the half wit on tv as well! I blame the owners,why the hell was that little girl left in that situation with a dog like that.
2007-01-05 11:23:03 · answer #6 · answered by NATALIE W 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Save the Dog Shoot the owner (in the Knee Caps)
2007-01-05 11:02:58 · answer #7 · answered by Agnon L 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
They should have only shot the owner.
2007-01-05 11:10:39 · answer #8 · answered by Nat 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
dogs dont kill for a reason the kid must have been messing with him and taking his food and really pissing him off and probably was a sadist for something like that to happen at all. no one should have been shot but the owner should have gone to prison but the guy shouldn't its the kids fault for being near a dog bigger then he is
2007-01-05 11:26:16 · answer #9 · answered by morrisonfan010 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
YES There is no such thing as a bad dog! It all depends how they were raised. Dogs are better than most people !
2007-01-05 11:02:04 · answer #10 · answered by rliescheidt 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋