The 90's cadillacs have fabulous seats and boot space. The mercs are great drives too. Which would be a better buy for rough long term use?
2007-01-05 09:48:04 · 5 answers · asked by j 2 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Buying & Selling
Stay away from the Cads. They have many problems, engine and electronics.
The smaller MB are are good bet.
2007-01-05 15:33:57 · answer #1 · answered by R1volta 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well a Cadillac would be better. They tend to have cheaper parts and labor than a benz. Although the Benz might have a longer life. So if its a 1990's car, I would probably go with the Cadillac due to cheaper parts and service
2007-01-05 09:51:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
doesn't matter if u want for rough use. u should consider the price u r paying and the repair cost if needed in future. i guess u will find cadillac more affordable, but again this is only keeping money in mind.
2007-01-05 10:58:33 · answer #3 · answered by abz 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would go with the Mercedes.. Foreign cars in general seem to be more reliable and last longer.
2007-01-05 09:49:46 · answer #4 · answered by tchem75 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mercedes are better of the two...........BUT..............they are a bear to find a REASONABLE mechanic when service is needed. The parts are readily avail. either; not to mention costly.
2007-01-05 09:55:20 · answer #5 · answered by LifeRyder 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋