English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I like to think of it as a good start for Quantum Spirituality

Peace and Love

2007-01-05 09:36:10 · 11 answers · asked by digilook 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

HI
I think it is an awesome equation, but shouldn't be a basis for any religion made scientific research.
Lammy

2007-01-05 09:38:47 · answer #1 · answered by Clammy S 5 · 0 0

ha ha.

its hilarious when those who, in their attempt at sounding intelligent... reveal their profound ignorance.

Axem, 1) do you have any philosophical view? do you realize whats trying to be said? I don't think you do.
2) do you realize what string theory is? and what it means? is your concept of "God" so restricted that you can't fathom other ideas?

I mean if what you mean when you say god is "a floating, intelligent ball of plutonium that turns people that offend it into purple cows" I would agree that there is no God.

but that doesn't mean what someone else means when they say God, does not exist.

E=MC^2 means Energy Equals Mass, multiplied by the speed of light squared.

so, the reverse, I guess, would be Mass Equals energy Divided by the speed of light squared.

the point being, in a sense, Energy = Matter, and Matter=Energy. that theres no difference.

that Matter is just energy slowed down, frozen, if you will,
thus, leading to the idea that "all that is" is merely, essentially an amorphous ball/pool/bubble of energy, with various degrees of density/solidity or lack thereof in it, none of it truly being separate.

if an ice cube is floating in the middle of a glass of water... is there a distinct point where its just water, or just ice? or is it a fuzzy line between them where its essentially melded?

if the vast majority of all that is, is essentially constructed within the range of that fuzzy line, then in a sense it changes the way you look at the construction of all that is.

2007-01-05 18:03:48 · answer #2 · answered by RW 6 · 1 0

That's a conflict of interest. If you are religious, you wouldn't like the theories presented by either this Einsteinian formula or the string theory, which both prove the impossibility of a god...

now, the only thing close to god that I know of is carbon monoxide: odorless, invisible, inaudible, deadly.

2007-01-05 17:40:25 · answer #3 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 0 0

LOL. i think its a few letters pretending to be math. *shrug*


i think 6 is afraid of 7 cause 7 ate 9 =\

i can give you the equation to find theair speed of a jet traveling in a specific direction at a ground speed of x, and tell you what angle the plane has to travel to reach its destination when wind is pushing at it at a y° at z mph. sounds like fun huh!

2007-01-05 17:39:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A relativity equation for quantum spirituality? Seems inherently contradictory to me, but you go with that.

2007-01-05 17:39:42 · answer #5 · answered by neil s 7 · 0 0

Do you mean General Relativity? E=mc2? Or are you changing it?
I do know that Albert Einstein believed in God. He is famous for saying 'Subtle is the Lord.'

2007-01-05 17:40:01 · answer #6 · answered by Callen 3 · 1 0

It might not be quite perfect, scientists cannot find one third of the mass, that should be there.
But that makes it even more exciting to me. Is there a planet drifting around, unaccounted for? (Hypothentically speaking, of course.)?

2007-01-05 17:57:25 · answer #7 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 0 0

mass is equal to the energy divided by the velocity of light squared?

Wow you did basic algebra with Einsteins equation

2007-01-05 17:43:44 · answer #8 · answered by onewhosubmits 6 · 1 0

Sorry sweetie, that is way over the head of this simple Texas girl.

2007-01-05 17:38:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I beg your pardon. I am mentally challenged. No, wait a minute, let me change that------

2007-01-05 17:41:07 · answer #10 · answered by Fish <>< 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers