Mainstream religion do not believe in evolution so how do you explain?

Question

The remnants of humans in different stage of the process such as Neanthrathal or Cro-Magnon man these species were similar to modern humans but still different in many ways but died out.

Did our creator create these humans first and then say naw! horrible design and wipe them out could they have been just the part of the evolutionary process where only the most efficient human design survive. please no microevolution answer, either evolution is or it isn't we can't have a little of it to suit your answer.

Answer 1

Microevolution is simply a variation. Species adapting. That has been observed in life. No one has ever observed a dog turning into a cat, or rock. You don't want the mention of micro because it messes up your macro.

Remember that evolution is only a theory. It has been a theory from the beginning.

You know everyone talks about us creationists being brainwashed, but what is taught from Pre-K on to college in public schools? I used to believe in evolution. For years. Then I got saved and started reading the bible. Knew it couldn't be. I also want to add that when I did beleive in evolution, I never believed we evolved from monkeys.

To answer your question. It depends on what fossils you are talking about. I know there were many aboriginals killed for their skulls because they thought they fit into the evolution process because of their bigger jaw.

the only reason they had bigger jaws was because they used them to make things. They were nomadic. Their jaws were bigger because their muscles were bigger.

Some of the remains have been pasted together to make it look like a human. Simple fact.

Answer 2

Mainstream religion does accept evolution. Pope John Paul II issued an edict in 1983 stating that the theory of evolution was the best explanation for life on Earth and Genesis should be taken as allegory. Most Protestants, even in the benighted US and A have no problem reconciling biological evolution through natural selection with Christ's ministry of redemption through salvation.

It is only a small (sadly vocal) minority that do not believe in evolution, and insist on a literal, fundamentalist interpretation of the bible as being completely totally, and unassailably factual.

Of those bible literalists, I have seen a few different interpretations forwarded to try to explain Neandertals and other hominid fossils:

1 - They don't exist. They were all created by evil atheistic scientists and/or the debbil to try to prove the bible wrong.

2 - They are the remains of deformed, but recent humans. They are at most a few thousand years old, and are probably all evil atheists and/or gay, and got wiped out in Noah's flood.

3 - They claim that evolution is 'just a theory' and stick their fingers in their ears, chanting 'Na na na na I can't hear you!'

Answer 3

If you studied in the same science class 201 that I did you know about the "missing link"; funny though, after further research did you know that every single one has been proven to be a hoax?? did you also know that people have different shaped heads and jaw lines today... did you know about people they found with different bone (skull) thicknesses that died recently??? This is no question at all for answer, it is simply one to prove one-sided hope and research... trying to prove an unprovable theory hoping that you will catch the other side sleeping...

please research all of the evidence not only the stuff that you want to .... there is more evidence..

if all your "peers" are trying to prove evolution through "peer-reviewed" studies is that accurate information?

no, it is not, it is heavily tainted information... not trust-worthy... I would greatly enjoy talking with you over coffee i bet...

me perceives that ye may have an I.Q. ( no slam intended)

Answer 4

Friend, It amazes me how you all try so hard to dis-prove God Or us Christians, There was a Prehistoric time Frame, Yes I am a Christian, These findings you are talking about has nothing to do with evolution, God created a upright Creature in the Prehistoric time that was known as cave men & women, But listern closely, They WERE NOT A SON OR DAUGHTER OF GOD, NOR DID THEY HAVE A SOUL, They were destroyed in the great Ice age, & all of this prehistoric time & Ice age time could have lasted for millions of yrs. But God's first Created Son was Adam & Then Eve, & they were SON & DAUGHTER OF GOD & THEY DID HAVE A SOUL. now do you want me to explain it futher for you, I can show you where that missing link is at, Look at that serpent in the Garden of eden, No it was not a snake Before the curse, But an upright creature that had a vocal cord, to be a worker for Adam, Then when God curse the serpent in Gen.3:14 Upon thou belly shall thou go, Cain is the son of the serpent, Able is the son of Adam & also this serpent did not have a soul, Now many ask me then did Cain have a soul, Yes, because he came through Eve, therefore Cain had to inherited part of Eve seed.

Answer 5

bitter grapes. Federal Courts governed Creationism faith. that is was hoping that Courts rule that evolution is purely too. the 1st step of this delusion is that Atheism be governed a faith. Then the courts might see that evolution is a coaching of this faith. subsequently the rabid insistence that Atheism is a faith and viral hoots and hollers whilst any courtroom language is even in all probability interpreted to help the belief. subsequently, too, the assertion that folk have self assurance or have self assurance in evolution. a number of those criminal fantasies are bearing directly to non-public readings of the form as though it have been project to person interpretation with out regard for historic precedent and the custom courtroom interpretation of it. word that social darwinism, a corrupt, non-scientific utility of scientific theories to racism and eugenics is the bases for condemning the finished of evolutionary technological information as non-scientific. The works of Darwin, which comprise speculations as to the status of races is termed incorrect as though modern-day technological information can't overturn the writings of Darwin that are by some means the comparable as sacred scripture to be examine actually. that could be a cynical and smart utility of non secular theory to imagined techniques of technological information. that is self-contradictory, yet in small bites is attainable. as with all conspiracy theory, it is adequate.

Answer 6

No! There is no evidence of any link that proves one kind of man evolved into another. They were obviously humans like you and me. Jaw bone structure differences can be found if you go from country to country today.

Evolution has never been proven and never will be.. God created different species individually period..

Matt

Answer 7

to answer the missing link question, i'll say that abnormal people are the missing link to another evolutionary step for mankind since we are letting them procreate too.

lol micro evolution, these people will come up with anything to make evolution look as fake as their bible.

Answer 8

Wrong. Mainstream religions do believe that evolution is the best explanation for speciation. Some fringe churches mostly based in the USA do not, their bad.

Answer 9

You forget the missing links.

~ Eric Putkonen

Answer 10

Everytime someone says, "Here look at this proof of evolution!" the believers say, "That's the work of the devil!" and never really learn anything.

Just watch.