English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Did he have a sneaky feeling he had not got the proto types quite right in the mark 1 version of things.
If he had things would not be allowed to mutate or evolve.

2007-01-05 03:37:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

(Cannot remove the first occurrence of the word stick from question)
Did he have a sneaky feeling he had not got the proto types quite right in the mark 1 version of things.
If he had things would not be allowed to mutate or evolve.

2007-01-05 03:41:27 · update #1

8 answers

i don't think it's like that. i think that when he created the world he knew environments would change and he made it so animals could evolve and adapt to their surroundings.
well i hope that helps, by the way I'm trying to get to level 2 on this so could you please make me the best answer. Thanks.

2007-01-05 03:41:42 · answer #1 · answered by maniconmonday 2 · 1 0

easily not! you should judge the Norse introduction narrative. "After the Frost Giants emerged from the ice, Buri known. He beget Bor. Bor and Bestla had 3 sons: Odin change into the first, Vili the 2d, and Vé the third. even as strolling alongside the sea shore the sons of Bor got here upon 2 trees, and from them they created a guy and a lady. Odin gave the guy and the girl spirit and existence. Vili gave them understanding and the skill of move. Vé gave them clothing and names. the guy change into named Ask [Ash] and the girl Embla [Elm?]. From Ask and Embla have sprung the races of adult men who lived in Midgard." it truly is easily a lot extra interesting then any of the middle eastern religions. easily the religion of the real believers is merely as strong as strong. the point right here's that there are thousands of introduction narratives.All of then have or had real believers. precisely and specially, please clarify why Genesis is the really "perfect" one? The unusual component is many of the creationist dogmas include evolution and organic decision. Theistic is one celebration. those that follow the Genesis account many times ought to argue that "day" contained in the account is different from we propose a " day" of 24 hours. Then there are those that say Genesis is an allegory or metaphor of what take position. It many times looks the understand God is getting scrambled. So how does Genesis clarify how the Koala undergo were given to Australia? we are looking for the passage that talks about the criiter getting off the Ark and then this is adventure to the Land Down lower than. we'd want to extremely favor to understand abut the way it crossed the Wallace Line. the point is that there is not merely 2 solutions. once you get to the introduction narratives are not all of them only a valid?

2016-12-01 21:05:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Thank you for seeing the possibility that God and evolution could actually co-exist.

I have a hard time imagining God making mistakes (it kind of goes against that whole perfect thing), but I do think He either knew (or wrote) the laws of nature, and used them as tools to get what He wanted.

2007-01-05 03:51:22 · answer #3 · answered by daisyk 6 · 0 0

OF the 6 forms of suggested "evolution" only one has ever been "demonstrated"... (did you get that reference to real science and not the fairy tale side).. it is the adaptation of a species (micro-evolution)... we are still waiting for you to demonstrate a stable and reproducible mutant gene? of course we realize that all the evidence of changed people, charities, miracles, un-explained phenomenon, medical testimonies and morality bear no such favor with you... you have researched "the sun" and convinced yourself there is "no moon" but yet you want to appear as an intellect...
to which I respond...

hahahahahsahhahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

good luck with all that denial....

2007-01-05 03:46:27 · answer #4 · answered by fast57chevy283 1 · 0 0

Well, it's possible. I mean, what creator would not give their creation the ability to adapt and survive? Life could not exist without evolution because that's the way the world works. The world constantly changes and we have to be able to adapt.

2007-01-05 03:43:38 · answer #5 · answered by (-_-) 3 · 1 0

I think he realised that he'd created such a harsh and hostile environment on earth that he needed evolution to ensure that some species had the ability to adapt and survive.

2007-01-05 03:40:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

including you!??

2007-01-05 03:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by lilith 2 · 0 0

What....?

2007-01-05 03:39:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers