They know that there is evidence for evolution because evidence is usually presented to them when they ask for it. Then they lie and say that there is none. Why do they do that? Isn't lying a sin by their own beliefs?
2007-01-05 02:49:47 · 13 answers · asked by acgsk 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Their entire belief system is based on the god lie, so it shouldn't surprise anyone that they lie. They are actually so shallow and ignorant, that they seldom realize they are lying.
2007-01-05 02:58:30 · answer #1 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Once again, another atheist who has never read a book or has no understanding of science nor religion.
It's RANDOMISM! Plank, Heisenberg, Hawking. RANDOMISM.
It's saying some mythical automatic Cosmic Casino plays dice with atoms and threw a lucky 7 and that's why you are here.
Evolution is the process that happens AFTER the lucky 7 gets thrown.
Evolution also works after Creationism, how else did some Atheists end up with a huge echo in their heads!
2007-01-05 03:04:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not believeing in the evidence you provide for Macro Evolution and saying there is none doesn't mean they are lying, it just means that they are using there faith that something is not exactly right with the evidence and they choose to believe it as false. It doesn't make them liars or stupid or anything. It makes them people who believe in God!
2007-01-05 02:54:20 · answer #3 · answered by Stacey B 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The introduction to Genesis and to the whole Bible ascribes everything to the living God, creating, making, acting, moving, and speaking. There is no room for evolution without a flat denial of Divine revelation. One must be true the other false. All of God’s works are good, great, wondrous, and perfect.
Man starts from nothing. He begins in helplessness, ignorance, and inexperience. All his works, therefore, proceed on the principle of evolution. This principle is only seen in human affairs: from the hut to the palace; from the canoe to the ocean liner; from the spade to the plowshare to machines. But the birds build their nests today as at the beginning. There is growth and development within man, but no passing, change, or evolution out from one into another.
For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be evident stages of evolution today. You would be able to find species in many stages of evolution in nature right now. For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be no God. And that’s exactly what evolutionists believe and are trying prove. The evolutionist bases his or her conclusions on human assumptions and reasoning, instead of on the documentary evidence of the manuscripts.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
The proof and evidence is all around you and everywhere, undeniable proof, and indisputable visible evidence. It is called creation and life. Unless your are blind, deaf, and senseless. You can see, smell, taste, hear, feel, and examine the evidence.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
We live on a planet teeming with life. Plant life with approximately 250,000 species, animal life with over a million species. Scientists are learning just how complex life is. So complex that it requires design. The evidence of design requires a designer. Scientists are also learning the conditions for life; just how perfect conditions here on planet Earth are to support all this life.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
The human brain, it absorbs forty megabytes per second of data while awake. That is two terabytes of data a day. At night, it sorts and stores that data through the creation of new chemical bonds and synaptic connectors.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
Sure, right, this all just happened and evolved. This sort of thinking takes considerable faith, exponentially more faith than believing in a creator.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
2007-01-05 02:57:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Isn't it wonderful that there is no sin possible in defense of Genesis? You can misrepresent things, distort, deceive, deny and lie outright and yet you have done no wrong. Sure, false prophets would do the same thing, but they don't do it to defend the Bible.
2007-01-05 03:36:18 · answer #5 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reverse is also true! There is even more evidence for the Creation view than for evolution! It seems like evolution is grounded on "missing links"!
2007-01-05 02:57:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't believe they are intentionally lying. I think they are merely sticking with the people they "trust" and accepting what they say about it over even the scientists who provide the proof for us. What I find amazing is the fact that they ignore all this info, claiming that "man" can not be trusted, but expect the rest of us to trust what they say, because they are quoting a book, written by man, they believe is Holy
2007-01-05 02:55:48 · answer #7 · answered by Kithy 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have still not seen evidence for evolution. Everything you call proof can also be explained from a creationists point of view.
According to evolution it took 10,000 years for humans to develope an arrowhead out of stone. Thats rediculous!
2007-01-05 02:55:21 · answer #8 · answered by dean 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
A lie is an intentional misrepresentation by one who knows the truth. In this context, Christians are not telling lies, we are stating what we believe to be facts.
2007-01-05 02:53:31 · answer #9 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Evidence, even a mountain of, is not proof.
Evolution has yet to find a missing link.
And if that's not enough, we have learned that evolutionists lie, hence, our skepticism..
2007-01-05 02:53:22 · answer #10 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋