English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I haven't heard much talk about the fence lately or any immigration reform.

If they give amnesty to illegal aliens, what is the next step? We will have about 20 million new citizens, and the illegal aliens will just keep coming in.

Are they going to do anything about the problem or let it continue forever, granting amnesty to illegals every 20 years or so?

2007-01-05 02:13:32 · 6 answers · asked by Pro-America, Anti-Illegal 2 in Politics & Government Immigration

6 answers

They haven't offered anything as yet and I hope that they don't.I think this is only a gear up for whats yet to come.Have you heard of The United States of North America ? I think this is where its all leading.Read below and its not fantasy ,its already in the works,without any congressional approval or national referendum.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/printer_3746.shtml
In the early years of the 21st century, elites in three nations — the United States, Canada, and Mexico — are busy creating a new political configuration called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). It would broaden and deepen the relationship between the three nations created in 1994 through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in dramatic ways.

The new architecture would include a free trade zone protected by a common security perimeter, within which goods, people, and capital would move freely across what had once been firmly established international borders.

First of all, it would require that U.S. citizens effectively surrender their citizenship in the independent constitutional republic founded in 1787. Unlike the USA, which was an organic outgrowth of a political system rooted in Anglo-Saxon laws, customs, traditions, and language, the political entity created through the SPP — in effect, the United States of North America (USNA) — would be a forced three-way marriage of wildly incompatible cultures and political systems.

The U.S. and Mexico are separated by language and have fundamentally incompatible political systems. Canada, riven with linguistic and regional conflicts, is hard-pressed to maintain its own unity, without the additional complications that would arise from an effort to join with the United States and Mexico. Lacking the natural affinities that led the original 13 states to create a constitutional republic, the USNA would likely be held together only through corrupt alliances among ruling elites, backed by undisguised force.

2007-01-05 02:27:09 · answer #1 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0 0

Social Security Agreement With Mexico Released After 3 1/2 Year Freedom of Information Act Battle

WASHINGTON, Dec. 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- After numerous refusals over three and a half years, the Social Security Administration (SSA) has released the first known public copy of the U.S.-Mexico Social Security Totalization Agreement. The government was forced to make the disclosure in response to lawsuits filed under the Freedom of Information Act by TREA Senior Citizens League, a 1.2 million-member nonpartisan seniors advocacy group.

The Totalization Agreement could allow millions of illegal Mexican workers to draw billions of dollars from the U.S. Social Security Trust Fund.

The agreement between the U.S. and Mexico was signed in June 2004, and is awaiting President Bush's signature. Once President Bush approves the agreement, which would be done without Congressional vote, either House of
Congress would have 60 days to disapprove the agreement by voting to reject it.

2007-01-05 02:42:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They are also going to let in 1.5 million more agricultural 'temporary workers who will get legalization after 3 years, and a whole bunch of others, on top of our current legalization. Legalization will also let current illegals bring in family. In addition, they are going to give illegals Social Security benefits.

As far as I can see the Senate at least intends to do nothing on the good side of the issue, at all.

2007-01-05 10:53:48 · answer #3 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 0

Guest worker program of 2004 should give you some sort of clue.
No, that immigration issue was only a politics thing on both sides in order to get votes.

do you think if they thought it was an isssue, they wouldn't have done anythign by now? the only answers to immigration in the past 6 years, was the guest worker program, and an unfunded fence.
just put 2 and 2 together.

2007-01-05 02:54:15 · answer #4 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 0 0

They were proposing to:

Reduce wages for American workers affected by illegal immigrant labor

Reduce the number of jobs available to American workers.

Burden our K-12 education

Give away your tax dollars on entitlements to non-citizens

Reduce the level of safety and security in the country

Maintain unsecured borders

Subsidize American corporations.

Create additional environmental and growth problems.


Ah, I can go on................

2007-01-05 02:25:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Unfortunately, it seems that no one in government really has the testicular fortitude to take care of the problem. Now we have so many of them here that they seem to have a voice with our government.

2007-01-05 02:22:42 · answer #6 · answered by rbarc 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers