2007-01-05 00:46:48 · 6 answers · asked by Soundguy 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
Yes a Horseman LX.
2007-01-06 00:51:10 · answer #1 · answered by Bob 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I work for a professional (portrait) photography company and we recommend Fuji S2 or S3 or Nikon D100 or D200 to our photographers. But lighting, white balance, and composition of the images will actually go further than your camera quality, in my opinion. You are dealing with stationary objects, not moving people. As long as your lighting is consistant, a cheaper SLR would be just as good. Canon Rebel or Nikon D50 are great cheaper choices, but JUST below professional quality.
2007-01-05 09:00:10 · answer #2 · answered by Dawnsy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Using the keyword "professional" then you would be looking at a high end Canon or Nikon.
Canon 1D MkII
Canon 5D
Canon 30D (starting to get toward the consumer end)
Nikon D2Xs
Nikon D200
Nikon D80 (getting toward the consumer end)
Now if you aren't very wealthy or planning on doing photography for a living then look at the Canon XTi, Nikon D80 or D50, or one of the Pentax or Sony cameras.
2007-01-05 16:23:25 · answer #3 · answered by k3s793 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would get a camera with a double exposure capability, it's comforting to know it's there when you need it. The only one that make them as far as I know is Nikon (D80, D200, and D2xs)
2007-01-05 04:11:01 · answer #4 · answered by Brian Ramsey 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nikon and Canon are great.
There's Sigma, and Fuji...
You will really want to focus on SLR, don't go with a point and shoot...
2007-01-05 07:24:01 · answer #5 · answered by Photog906 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Canon Rebel XTi
Kodak P880 or P850 or both.
2007-01-05 00:58:34 · answer #6 · answered by beauxPatrick 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋