Probably not unless they are willing to be targets for anti abortionist "Army of God" assassins.
2007-01-05 00:22:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by dollparty.geo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and No. It all depends on how the doc views life. This is NOT a "salvation issue" so I know docs on both sides of the fence. Both think that they are working for the ultimate good, and both rationalize their point of view. That is not to say that the doc on the pro side are damned to hell and the other side will go to heaven, or visa versa, ultimate salvation depends on other things. For example, if a doc walks up to the gates of heaven, suddenly he is stopped and told that he has to go to hell because he prevented the healing of several Xian brothers and sisters because he did not use stem cell research. NO NO NO. You see my point, I'm sure.
God Bless.
2007-01-05 08:24:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Looking for the truth... 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A Fundamentalist Christian would certainly use what was available to help someone. Gaining that research that way when clearly there are better ways is still foolish and unethical.
2007-01-05 08:22:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pilgrim 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
it first would have to be prov en that it would cure something before any one can use it so far promoters only state may be helpful then the doctor would have to answer themselves
i agree with williamzo thanks for the 2 points
2007-01-05 08:21:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by louise m 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ONLY a "Fundamentalist Christian Doctor" would be able to answer this question.
BUT thanks for the two points
2007-01-05 08:14:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by williamzo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm still trying to figure out why christians take aspirin...can't god cure them?
2007-01-05 08:18:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋