I am asking only one question and that is WHY HANG AND KILL ONLY SADDAM!!!
Indian King Ashoka killed thousands of people but was not hanged. Almost all the kings killed thousands of people but almost all the kings were not hanged. Almost all the World leaders have killed many people but the leaders have not been hanged and killed. Which leader has not killed anybody. George W Bush and the almost all the American Presidents have killed thousands of people but none of the American Presidents have been hanged or killed. All the Indian kings have killed thousands of people but none of them was hanged. But as for as Saddam is concerned he did not go to USA and killed any USA people. When this is so, hanging him is it right!!! I look forward to your replies.
2007-01-04 19:45:39 · 14 answers · asked by Indian wizard 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Fantastic Question you have a nice brain that is fully functional. George Bush is a guilty of crimes on humanity. All world leader have started some war or the other so they are all equally guilty of murder.
Saddam was very unfortunate to be in the bad books of the Americans. They supplied arms to Iraq for the war with Iran but after he had a disagreement with USA they had him tried and executed by waging an illegitamate war against Iraq.
The hanging of Saddam has proved that Bush is the leading war criminal after Adolf Hitler. He has done all that a dictator would do cheat in the elections and waging an illegal war against Iraq after imposing sanctions for 13 years. He belives that he should make a country die of starvation before bombing it.
2007-01-05 17:06:13 · answer #1 · answered by George J 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Almost all the kings? You talking about the old time kings throughout the Middle East and Europe that started wars of conquest? What are you living in a time warp? Maybe back then but I know of very few world leaders today that do this sort of thing - not but a handful of kings left in the world and even fewer with any real power to cause mayhem even if they wanted to. Tell you what. I'm all for hanging ANY president, dictator, prime minister, or even king that murders hundreds of thousands of his own people for no other reason but to keep or expand his own power and influence. There's a list of those - Sudan being at the top right now - and I'd gladly put a noose around every one of their necks. He was tried, convicted, and executed by his own people not the U.S. Or do you think you should have had a say in his fate when it wasn't you suffering under his heel? And people call Americans arrogant.
2007-01-04 21:37:48 · answer #2 · answered by Dark 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
staring at lots of the previous solutions jogs my memory that people who shout loudest have the least to declare and the main to cover. The Iraqis that Saddam killed have been in many cases killed with the conivance and appoval of england and usa, not that Britain has had an autonomous voice for years, and we killed many with the sanctions we imposed on Iraq, which the politicians knew and in all probability was hoping may well be the case, so as that they might portray what have been their murderous tyrant as now an autonomous murderous tyrant. attempt looking in the back of the headlines, a number of you.
2016-10-30 01:25:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In History it is called Victor's justice. USA has got the unique distinction of dropping first & second or only Atom Boms on innocent civilians, It is also the Country which used Chemical warfare like Nepalm Boms, human rights violations against prisoners of war. But in war and love end result justifies the means.
2007-01-04 22:37:22 · answer #4 · answered by Brahmanyan 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
See that's the problem with people. The United States didn't kill Saddam Hussein even though they'll go down as history as the ones that killed him. His own people (Iraqis) killed him. He was found guilty of war crimes as his regime got overthrown in Iraq when the United States came. People found guilty of war crimes in Iraq are subjected to hanging.
2007-01-04 19:55:01 · answer #5 · answered by passow6322 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Name me one American president who tortured, raped, beat, starved, gassed, and ordered mass executions as political reprisals.
Hussein was not hanged by Americans. He was hanged by Iraqis. That's because he committed crimes against humanity against Iraqis.
I'm not even saying that hanging Hussein was right or wrong. I'm just saying that it was the Iraqis' call.
I'm also saying that comparing Hussein to any American president is a ridiculous exercise in moral relativism.
Moral relativism is when you think that one thing isn't any better or worse than another thing -- even when it clearly is.
.
2007-01-05 00:19:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is related to maily American Politics...Bush wants to gain confidence among its citizens in forthcoming Elections...so is the show...Americans have money and power who can stop them from doing such acts...Only Supreme GOD can save this world..Let us pray for it
2007-01-05 04:51:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
first of all he killed many people so he wz hanged.n the second reason is tht he used to mess wid george bush by revealin out his neg points.
2007-01-05 22:38:22 · answer #8 · answered by vivek s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was hanged because he was caught.
2007-01-04 22:05:55 · answer #9 · answered by jmcm 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in the end saddam was killed by the iraqis for what he did,
more will come around..
as for the other baseless examples u give,
each have their own circumstance and the laws like War Crimes and Genocide still prevails
2007-01-04 19:54:55 · answer #10 · answered by pinoydj619 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋