Why do so many continue to believe Darwin's lie?

Question

Evolution is not real science. It is philosophy. The philosophy of atheists. The scientific method cannot prove evolution. There is no experiment that can prove it, like there is for gravity.

Darwin used micro evolution or variations within species to make up macro evoltion and the lie that huamans evolved from different species. A species cannot have a different limb from that of their parents.
DNA and modern science proves that evolution is impossible.
How many agree?

micro evolution is a fact. Macro evolution is a lie ans is impossible. There is a difference. Do some research.

For some of you Christians: there is no way you can accept Evolution and God. Evolution was created for the purpose of destroying religion.

I meant to write organ instead of limb. An offspring cannot have an organ different from their parent.

Answer 1

Noone really "believes" in evolution. Belief does not require the burden of proof and is therefore unscientific. We simply find that evolution is plausable because no other alternate explanation with enough emperical evidence exists. I am probably correct in assuming that you are a creationist person, or an intelligent design believer. Intelligent design is just creationism with a shiny new wrapper. Neither use the scientific method or emperical evidence to prove thier case.
You should do some research on Charles Darwin before you make assumptions about his religious beleifs. He was a deeply religious man. In fact he studied theology and intended to enter the clergy after his studies. But once he sailed on the HMS Beagle and got away from the influence of the church, he began to think critically for the first time in his life. He was agnostic by the time he wrote "The Origin of Species".
Its funny how people like you exist. You attack the very groundwork for all modern biological sciences and medicine, yet you depend on the very same sciences and medicine in your daily life.

Answer 2

"A species cannot have a different limb from that of their parents."
"variations within species"

You just proved a key component of vertebrate evolution. You allow that there are variations within species, and that the limbs will derive from parents. The fact that all terrestrial vertebrates have four limbs (with the exception of a few creatures that have lost one or both pairs) is evidence of common descent.

Numerous experiments have demonstrated evolution. DNA and modern science are all in support of evolution. The claims of impossibility derive from archaic ignorance.

Answer 3

what's incorrect with this submit? properly... for starters, Charles Darwin has been ineffective for over a century. "residing a lie" seems somewhat confusing for every person who's ineffective. 2d, "experience" --- study to apply English acceptable, please. Your arguments heavily isn't any further effective yet they are going to look nicer because of the fact which you would be using the language because it became meant. third... we don't have a concepts of our own? you're the guy who blindly takes the understanding of a 2000-12 months-previous e book for which NO residing person could be questioned who became a witness to the activities therein. so which you pay attention blindly on your preacher and then declare that we are the sheep? they don't call a congregation a "flock" for not something, bud. I extremely have examine an excellent variety of the Bible. It fairly DID make me think of - approximately how certainly one of those cosmologically transcendent being has such crass human-like thoughts alongside with jealousy and adequate rage to reason a flood. How forgiving this being is who orders the Israelites to kill each and all of the boys and boys in a village, enslave the ladies, and generally wipe out those people. Yeah, actual forgiveness there. Then, you malign Darwin's intelligence. you're so dense which you think Darwin wasn't in Einstein's or Newton's league. besides the undeniable fact that that is an apples-and-oranges assessment. Newton invented calculus to mathematically look into gravity. Einstein used some severe tensor calculus for a number of his artwork. Darwin became a various form of theoretician. yet he formed theories that required stepped forward, out-of-the-field questioning. Genius isn't math. in specific circumstances that is techniques. yet then, based on your rambling diatribe, you does not be attentive to something approximately techniques. you do not seem to have any. ok, i might desire to be incorrect, yet it is the way it seems. EDIT: Plz.... we are actually not taking your assertion out of context by technique of correcting you. you're being too dense to renowned which you're incorrect, incorrect, incorrect approximately what they believed.

Answer 4

"A species cannot have a different limb from that of their parents."

Really?

"Polydactyly, or extra digits, is a common trait among cats, particularly it seems, among Celtic cats and cats on part of America's Eastern coast and South West Britain. This distribution may well be linked. Except for Twisty Cats, polydactyly is not a product of bad breeding. It is simply a naturally occurring genetic variation"

Huh... guess you're right, and reality is wrong. Thanks for the info.

Edit: Right, because it's so easy to type o r g a n when you meant to type l i m b. The letters are practically right next to each other. And if I show you that internal organs can be different too, what will you have *meant* to have typed, then?

Answer 5

As a Christian who accepts the concept of evolution to be harmonious with God's plan, I suggest you take some time to read Darwin's book. It's actually very insightful and quite interesting.

Answer 6

> "Darwin was just plain stupid. And the people who followed his ideas just as silly"
Name calling. That's a great way to prove your point.

> "Can you imagine?"
In a nutshell, you claim that because you personally cannot imagine something, it must not have happened. It only says something about you, not about the subject. We know it as "argument from personal incredulity".

> "Men from monkeys, mammals from ocean creatures"
Nobody ever claimed men evolved from monkeys. Humans and apes have common ancestry.

> "....so when you're eating a fish you're eating your ancestor?"
No.
Do you think that after speciation the original species stops evolving?

This makes me shudder. How bad are american schools? Please tell me you're a kid and your education is not complete yet.

Answer 7

I do not believe that this is necessarily true, it cannot be disproved either. i believe in God and in creation, for sure. but, it is hard to argue with what is happening right in front of our eyes. If there is any hope of an afterlife, we must believe in God and what the Bible teaches us, so the thought of evolution gives us no hope. I guess you can call me a straddler, but I think it could me a magnificent combo of both.

Answer 8

Individual choice.
Some prefer to believe in Darwinian Lies.
Others scriptural lies!

The judge is as elusive as ever !
Who says theology is not a philosophy based on assumptions and blind beliefs ?

Answer 9

evolution IS real science. and Darwin was a theist when he went on his voyage and later an agnostic.

Answer 10

I thought you meant the one christians tell about his fictious "deathbed conversion"