Okay who would you pick if you had to.... please be honest:
1. A not so attractive, short man who is good in bed ( I mean really
good)
- OR -
2. An attractive tall man who royally sucks in bed ( I'm talking "one
minute man"... Okay 5 minutes)
Honestly who would you pick?!?
2007-01-04 16:44:49 · 26 answers · asked by venom! 6 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
ER.... some of y'all need to chill! I am just asking a simple question so that I know what most girls would choose! thats all! lol!
Plus... it appears that some 'men' are actually 'women' or something! :)
The question clearly states: GIRLS only PLease!!!
2007-01-04 17:02:13 · update #1
. An attractive tall man who royally sucks in bed ( I'm talking "one
minute man"... Okay 5 minutes)
2007-01-04 16:47:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The not so attractive short man who is awesome in bed. Why? Because after a person looses their looks there HAS to be something else there to keep the relationship intresting. Besides you can always know that even if you are with not so pretty one that you could have been. It doesn't matter what other people think.
2007-01-05 00:47:54 · answer #2 · answered by Smarty Pants 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well if u r really into sex u should chose the short guy, but if sex is not a big priority choose the tall guy, I personally would choose the short guy, and just would spend alot of time alone with him so i would be more confident about being with the short guy in public. I don't know why looks matter so much these days but it does.
2007-01-05 00:50:22 · answer #3 · answered by M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't like answering questions that specifically say girls only... I assume lots of girls would say 2 simply because he can be trained. The short man may be good in bed, but guess what, women dont like short guys and you cant get taller.
Again, women dont like short guys, women like tall guys and tall guys like short women.
2007-01-05 00:49:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well it seems you are VERY concerned about the BED maybe you should consider the person and not the bed because you will be spending more time with them out of the bed than in it. Don't make any dumb mistakes, and stop sleeping around.
2007-01-05 00:48:27 · answer #5 · answered by whattheheck 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good in bed -- especially if you think there's a chance of marriage or long term relationship. Bad sex can lead to a really miserable relationship and life together!
2007-01-05 01:00:20 · answer #6 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's the scenario:
Both looks and sexual greatness diminishes with age but what gives you more pleasure? and that should be the one you choose.
Looks are NOT going to keep you warm in bed for x amount of years to come....... sorry about the pun
2007-01-05 00:47:55 · answer #7 · answered by mac 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, it's great to be with someone who is good in bed, but how does he make you feel out of bed? That should be your deciding factor.
2007-01-05 00:52:24 · answer #8 · answered by Sara 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
guy # 2, call me a shallow person, but i'd rather be with an attractive guy, and i bet we can work on his "horrible-in-bed" problem
I mean it's not like we're gonna have sex 24/7 , there are other things to do in a relationship besides sex
2007-01-05 00:47:08 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Meow♥ 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither one. If you think the first one is so bad looking that you have to mention it maybe you shouldn't be with him. Obviously you don't appreciate him. And the other guy... if you are with him with for his looks... well obviously you don't appreciate him either. Maybe you should be less shallow and you'll find the "perfect" man.
2007-01-05 00:48:27 · answer #10 · answered by gravytrain036 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋