should i have my son circumsized?

Question

which way is better to go circumsized or not?

Answer 1

When I had my son 8 months ago I decided to have him circumsized after the doctors and nurses told me the pros and cons. There were more pros than there were cons. So I decieded to have him circumsized. But I have heard that a boy that is not circumsized will have alot more problems in life than a boy that is. To me they seem cleanier if they are circumsized. But you do what you feel is right for your child. When I got pregnant me and my boyfriend sat down and had a long conversation on what to do. Just remember that whatever you do will be the best decision for your child. Congrats on the expanat child!

Answer 2

Males that are circumsized have less chance of infection. With that extra foreskin, more bacteria can gather in it and cause an infection. There is a study that just came out saying that men with foreskin are more prone to getting STDs because the skin is more sensitive. It's also easier to clean a circumsized penis than an uncircumsized one. As a male gets older, if he has foreskin, he is supposed to retract that foreskin to clean. Well I know one guy (who is 20 years old) who is not able to retract his foreskin. So it's better to have your baby circumsized for his well being. Good luck!

Answer 3

I say leave it on my own. Circumcision is a painful surgical technique for an infant because of the fact they generally do not use anesthesia or maybe whilst they do it is not thoroughly effectual. there is likewise the potential of botched jobs. Why take the possibility of messing with something that works only nice now? with the aid of how circumcision isn't a call for to be a Muslim. it is not interior the Qu'ran. it is basically a typical custom interior Islam because of the fact Islam is a faith branched from the traditions of Judaism and because maximum Muslims have confidence that Mohammad became circumcised. besides the shown fact that it is not required with the aid of religion. after all, why not basically enable him elect that when he's sufficiently old to make the determination for himself? it incredibly is HIS physique in spite of each thing. only for the reason which you're a Muslim would not propose that your son will finally end up being one. faith is a call too undergo in techniques. If being a Muslim is that substantial to him whilst he's older and he thinks that being circumcised is something he desires to do to be a competent muslim, only leave the determination as much as him. it is not comparable to it incredibly is something that must be carried out appropriate away in any case.

Answer 4

I am very torn on this as well. I have a 19month old son that we did not have done. He has already had one VERY painful infection and the for-skin has not started to retract. I have had two doctors tell me it will have to be removed or stretched with each growth spurt, we are now waiting to see a urologist. When he was born we decided not to have it done because it was an unnecessary procedure, would you have a girl circumcised? In some countries they do and because of our strong stance against female circumcision we decided not to do it. Now I wish we had. Whether we go for the repeated stretching procedure or the full circumcision now ( we will probably have him circumcised) it is going to be very painful for him. More than it would have been at birth. There is also new research showing uncircumcised men have a greater risk for certain STDs and penile cancers. Some uncircumcised men go their whole life without complications but for those who don't I bet they wish their parents would have had it done at birth. The upside to not having it done is greater sensitivity to the organ and the risk of infection is much lower than what is was a few years ago due to better hygiene. It really is an unnecessary procedure but my opinion would be to have it done at birth and don't risk the pain and possible humiliation if it has to be done later in life.

Answer 5

It is your decision ultimately. I can tell you this I see people say it is so painful and they get no medication and that there is crap. I am a surgical tech in the OR and have assisted on many of these both on newborns and older males. Normally they do not use any pain medication but it is not necessary. I have hardly ever seen a baby cry while this is being done. I normally stand over them while assisting and talk to them and they never even flinch. Upon the mothers request a topical analgesic can be applied to numb the area so STOP saying they get no medication. If your baby didn't get anything to numb the site and you were so worried about it then it was your own fault because they will do it upon request.

Answer 6

No WAY! Not your body to do cosmetic surgery on.

Also, you wouldn't cut any other parts off would you? Just because there is a remote chance of them having problems. Ear infections are much more common, yet we don't remove those. Breast cancer is more prevelant in men than penile cancer, yet we don;t remove breast buds at birth, even though they are waaaaay more useless than the foreskin.

Google "functions of the foreskin" so that you are absolutely sure of what is being taken away during this needless surgery.

Foreskins are there to keep the galns protected and it is actually fused to the gans like a fingernail to the nailbed. It only needs to be wiped on the outside, like a finger. premature retraction causes tears and scarring and can allow bacteria to get in. The foreskin is self-cleaning, like a girl's vulva.

Jackie J. STOP RETRACTING! you are causing the infection!!!!! Retraction does not happen until puberty for some boys. it should be allowed to occur naturally. Please read up on the subject before you cause your precious baby any more pain.

As for the other poster. Why doesn't your man get himself cut? At least an adult gets anesthetic and pain meds.

The pain is far more severe in a newborn, yet they routinely get nomore than sugar water.

i am the mother of a happily intact 23 month-old. i also do childcare and HAVE NEVER seen an infection in an intact boy.

85% of the world's men are intact and seem perfectly able to keep themselves clean and uninfected. think on that.

Answer 7

I have two intact boys and I'm glad we left them that way. Things must be very different in Canada becasue time and time again I keep seeing the locker room arguement. The circumcision rate in Canada in 2005 was less than 10% so if anyone is going to be made fun of in the locker room it's going to be the circumcised boys.

I also always hear people saying that a circumcised penis is so much easier to care for. With a baby you just wash the penis like you wash your finger. You do NOT pull the foreskin back. It's so simple to wash!

Please let your SON make the decision himself. It's not your penis and not your foreskin, it's your son's.

Answer 8

Definitely! He will thank you later trust me. My ex still despises his mother for not having him circumsized- although he had more important issues to deal with!

Answer 9

I have a 20 month old son and am 33 weeks pregnant with another boy.I had my 1st circumcized and will also have this one circumcized too.I did it for when they are older and are sexually active-most men are.Also it is at less rick for infection and other problems.I definantly reccomend it!

Answer 10

my son is 22 i did not have him done and he is fine.there is no reason to have there skin taking off.for what.it there for a reason.besides these poor baby's all the pain they go threw don't listen to people who say they don't feel it.of course they do .when my son was born they were doing a baby boy in the nursery the crying and screaming was so bad i had to leave.and my sister had her son done she had so much trouble and he didn't grow right.