English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I realize this statement is not true (if you're a skeptic) and I don't believe in it either but I need to prove it. I need RAW data (at least a 100 points).

Carbon Levels in ppm and GLOBAL temperature in Celcius
from the 1900 to around 2005.

Also are there any other variables I should look at to help me prove my thesis?

Thanks you.

2007-01-04 10:59:42 · 4 answers · asked by xhissi 2 in Environment

4 answers

Go watch An Inconvenient Truth. Al Gore gives you plenty of numbers and graphs to chew on.

2007-01-04 11:02:50 · answer #1 · answered by Roman Soldier 5 · 0 0

Well, over the years scientists are arguing the fact of CO2 causing the global warming effect. Until recent years, most of us are beginning to accept this fact. Scientists on the advocating side, proved this theory by comparing the CO2 level and the global temperature from the past and now. And indeed, the amount of CO2 has risen dramatically especially after the industrialisation era. However, there is still room for doubts. Anyway, till now, there is no other better fact to support the current rise of temperature.

2007-01-04 11:54:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To start with is CO2 is very heave and stay pretty much on the ground, But Mother Nature fixated that problem a few million years ago when she introduced the plant. All plants take CO2 in and keep the C and give us back the O2. So the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere is very little because the plants have taken care of most of it.

2007-01-04 12:24:28 · answer #3 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0 0

What you write and what you published as links is nice, yet in basic terms 0.5 ok. think of somewhat approximately it. All climatologists are no longer deniing the effects of water vapor. it somewhat is blanketed in all fashions. Why that? it somewhat is only so, that the end results of water vapor is unquestionably understood and you should work out it as consistent decrease than good climate. no count number if it somewhat is warming, you will get greater water vapor, and greater greenhouse gasoline. Water vapor is reacting as a feedback to different aspects very speedy. Ths is a vast difference to the different greenhouse gases, which stay as much as quite a few one thousand years. as a result water vapor is the advise greenhouse gasoline, yet CO2 is the motor, this is shifting climate. the priority with synthetic CO2 is, that it somewhat is one greater volume to the organic greenhouse result, inclusive of its beneficial feedback mechanisms. section 2. Its lots CO2 over the USA sure, yet did you think of relating to the cooling results of aerosoles?those are lots greater probably to impress close by climate than greater long term effects of CO2. as much as the 70 ies aerosoles have masked the warming results of greenhouse gases mind-blowing. evaluate, that we've many aerosoles from China too.

2016-11-26 19:40:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers