Neither.
2007-01-04 08:58:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would have to say healthy but economically bad because what is the use of having money if you can't have fun spending it...
2007-01-04 09:04:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Healthy because money is not life i mean i could live off of 1 grand just money isn't everything
2007-01-04 09:00:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by kris j 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
My family and I are dealing with the first issue you mentioned in regards to my 13 yr old daughter. If it wasnt for our money Im not sure how we would afford all the medical care she requires.
2007-01-04 08:59:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by texas_angel_wattitude 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would rather be healthy. What good is the money if you are too sick to enjoy it or will die before being able to enjoy it?
2007-01-04 08:59:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by zaytox0724 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
healthy i can always try to make more money or get a better education to earn more money
you can not replace or get better health all the time
2007-01-04 09:00:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wicked 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm going to go with healthy but poor because I don't know wealthy and diseased.
2007-01-04 09:03:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by IamBatman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would choose to be healthy but economically bad...and your answer to my question "whats wrong with likin the same sex" go ahead and explain to me why its wrong...im very open to everyones opinions...i just have my ways..but im interested in what other ppl think..so yea..go for it!
2007-01-05 03:42:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
healthy, because there are always ways to improve your economic status, but sickness leads to unhappyiness and death
2007-01-04 09:06:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by as 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
healthy. money can buy you stuff but not happiness
2007-01-04 08:58:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋