This was a question that was asked on the radio, some said in their 40's and some said as long as they are healthy and prepared for the risk that they are willing to take, what do you think?
2007-01-04 02:57:02 · 11 answers · asked by sweetme35 5 in Health ➔ Other - Health
I am pro-choice on most things and I would not make a medical decision for anyone but myself and my children.
Let each woman make her own choice.
2007-01-04 06:19:16 · answer #1 · answered by Cammie 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't know, it's a personal opinion...I'm 34 and I'm done as far as I'm concerned. It's not the pregnancy, it's the energy required after those pups shoot out that is the problem....I'm exhausted with 2.
2007-01-04 14:01:07 · answer #2 · answered by vegetable soup 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Over 35 is just plain selfish, there are too many risks for the baby getting pregnant over that age.
2007-01-04 10:59:11 · answer #3 · answered by 132 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If it happens naturally then its not too old. I think if a woman has to have special treatments to conceive then thats too old;
2007-01-04 10:59:37 · answer #4 · answered by huggz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
18-35 are child-bearing years. Past that and the eggs are beginning to smell a bit rotten.
2007-01-05 05:36:55 · answer #5 · answered by Ministry of Camp Revivalism 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
67
2007-01-04 10:58:04 · answer #6 · answered by haleyvh 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I've heard thirty. However I just heard that a women gave birth to twins at 67. Just think what a sweet grandmother she'll be.
2007-01-04 11:05:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think it's 40 !
I remember that I read that information in a magazine for women in my country !!!
2007-01-04 11:13:21 · answer #8 · answered by crystal_heart100 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
43 and over
2007-01-04 10:59:27 · answer #9 · answered by Kimberly 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
its up to her doctor and her, depends on what condition her health is in. rarely u would find dat women can give birth at 60 +, so u never know
2007-01-04 11:04:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋