2007-01-04 00:56:55 · 29 answers · asked by turntable 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Only if it is placed on Mecca during the Hajj.
2007-01-04 01:02:29 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Unfortunately as easy as it sounds it would NOT stop them!
I mean... where would you drop it? Where would you stop?
The problem is that the "Movement has spread across the entire world, if you read enough of the world news you would find out that it is taking place in every country across the globe.
The only thing that can be done is what we are doing now... just keep gathering intelligence and going after them... relentlessly!
The problem with that is there is a large amount of "Government" people that would rather have you believe there isn't a problem and if we ignore it, it won't affect us... Bull, we did that with 911 as well as many other incidents, the extremists flaunt it and we ignored it for a long time!
Ignore it no more... we need to get on and stay hot on their tales... it is the only way.
2007-01-04 01:29:47 · answer #2 · answered by James M 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, and why would anyone think that it would? The only way to successfully deal with terrorism is through the use of ‘police’ tactics and methods. You cannot use a warfare mentality, approach, and methods to solve the terror problem.
When was the last time you heard anything about the IRA or the Red Brigade? You don’t hear anything about them because they were handled as crime issues with police methods and tactics.
The only people pushing the ‘war’ strategy are the same people who have failed in Afghanistan and Iraq and are losing their ‘war on terror’. How bad is your plan if it leads to defeat in two of the militarily weakest countries in the entire history of mankind?
And, how incompetent is your execution if it results in your enemy becoming more popular, powerful, and successful than even they ever dreamed possible, while simultaneously turning the entire world against you?
Exactly how much damage to America will be enough to satisfy the conservative and religious right? Continuing to follow their strategy will lead only to victory by the terrorists and defeat to America.
Why do you think Bin-Laden made that video in 2004 to help Bush win re-election?
2007-01-04 01:17:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
First it would take more than one, many more, to take out a large focus of the problem, Iran then on to Syria and probably Pakistan
and possibly Saudi Arabia and Indonesia. Then with that done we could start going after the smaller groups that are hiding around the world. Unfortunately this will never happen because we are hamstrung by our own and our allies political correctness and inability to see the situation for what it actually is, and this may end up costing us the whole ball of wax.
2007-01-04 01:14:52 · answer #4 · answered by booboo 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
i am a Muslim girl and every real Muslim hates what's going on in the name of Islam, these are terrorist people that don't belong to any religion, i think they should be killed in a way but not a nuclear bomb it'll kill many other innocents...
maybe all the world take a very bad idea about Islam because of those horrible terrorists
2007-01-04 01:04:19 · answer #5 · answered by atheer l 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Don't drop it yet, but you could aim a few nuke missles at a few muslim sites in the event that some terrorists sets one off in any US city. Make it kown the consequences of their actions beforehand. Yes... it will take out a few million innocent people, but these "innocent" people are not innocent until they band together to stopr the terrorists living amoung them. The "devil may care" attitude from the muslim world makes them co-terrorists. Face the facts people!
2007-01-04 01:45:54 · answer #6 · answered by tmarschall 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hiroshima is not a nuclear bomb. It is a city in Japan.
Hope this helps! :)
2007-01-04 01:01:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
like the mormons, they have a Rule that it is reliable to maintain popping out babies (screw the inhabitants problem), so i'm afraid that they are going to be taking photos little terrorists out for awhile yet. on the reliable side regardless of the undeniable fact that, evolution will take over because of the fact the generations slip in the process the hollow of anger. the youngsters will ultimately be taught, "hi, I ain't gonna kill myself for (insert BS reason right here)". no longer even our youthful grade college young ones in u . s . a . of america are dumb sufficient to fall for the lies they base their lives on, so it is going to ultimately disintegrate. of direction, we've our very own religions and lies right here, so it may take a little time for them to seize up; in spite of the incontrovertible fact that it is exciting continuously being a step forward.
2016-10-29 23:32:02 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there are Muslims by the millions and terrorists by the thousands, why don't the "good Muslims kill the terrorists and start living in peace like they say?
2007-01-04 01:17:39 · answer #9 · answered by Chuck C 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It probably would never result to that because of the oil in the region. If you think gas costs a lot now, imagine what it would cost if we vaporized the oil pumps in the Middle East. Bad idea.
2007-01-04 01:06:50 · answer #10 · answered by Kilroy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THE CULL>>>>COMMING SOON TO ALL COUNTRIES><><><>Examine the coupling force of a thermonuclear tsunami....maby one bomb correctly placed could start THE CULL...the remaining question is,,, would the money men benefit?
2007-01-04 02:07:13 · answer #11 · answered by stratoframe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋