If a boxer, a shaolin monk, a ninja, and a roman gladiator were to fight in a battle royale, who wins?

Answer 1

This is a very entertaining question, I will do my best to answer it in all seriousness.

More than likely the Roman Gladiator would win, that is counting that it is a seasoned gladiator and not just a prisoner thrown in the cage for the first time.

The boxer would more than likely take out the monk, since the monk would peacefully object to this and has never truly utilized his techniques on another live person.

The ninja (who I am assuming is classic old school Shogunate era ninja who is seasoned) being put in the cage would put him at a serious disadvantage since the element of surprise is ruined, however since he is armed would probably beat the boxer.

The gladiator, already accustomed to weaponized fights to the death would then have little to no problem taking out the ninja who usually relies on stealth, and surprise to take out his victims and not so much one on one combat.

So the Gladiator wins due to experience in full out fights to the death with weapons.

Answer 2

The question makes me laugh and I thank you for it.
Let me put in a few assumptions... the Gladiator is armed and is seasoned. The monk is from years ago before the first destruction of their home and the Ninja is one from old school Japan (or believe it or not China... rumored to be the origin but who can tell for sure). The boxer I'll assume is an experienced fighter. I would assume the ninja would immediately hang back and let the other fight. I'll assume the gladiator may or may not. The boxer and monk would fight and get killed by the weapon wielding gladiator or the Ninja hitting from a distance. The ninja would attack but the gladiator would anticipate it and that would be the end of the Ninja.
Just my thoughts... Best of luck.

Answer 3

Wow, talk about a fun question! Since no type of gladiator was mentioned then I’ll throw in one of my personal favs and that would be the Secutores (shield, gladius and the usual armor as the murmillo). It’s pretty obvious who would win between the whole group and that would be the gladiator. Boxer wouldn’t stand a chance due to being unarmed. The monk would be armed, as would the ninja, at the same time, they lack the necessary defense that armor would allow, and I know all about the benefit of armor. LOL I would also have to say that the ninja and monk would probably go for tag teaming the gladiator first due to the menacing aura of the gladiator who would be ‘feeling’ out his opponents allowing them to make the first move. With that being said, the ninja and monk would be skillfully hacked into little iddy-biddy pieces just after their own arsenal of weapons were rendered useless.

Answer 4

Let's see....The boxer would be knocked out by the roman gladiator by who is using his shield.The shaolin monk would fight the roman gladiator till he is down with a staff.The ninja would throw some shurikens at the shaolin monk but the shaolin monk evade it.Ninja retreats and shoot poison or normal dart at the shaolin monk.Shaolin monk knocked out.

Answer 5

Holy cow!!!!! this is such a video game fantasy.
This is an odd mix of fighters.
The boxer will be outclassed by those with weapons.
The monk would not fight.
The ninja would not know what to do with out the element of surprise, darkness and deception.
I think the gladiator would win.

Answer 6

Gladiator

Answer 7

i assume this question is approximately it quite is extra constructive. yet there are incredibly too many variables. I mean are we speaking a skillful heavyweight boxer as against a skillful shaolin gung fu proponent? Is the shaolin gung fu practitioner of equivalent weight? My very own opinion is that an quite reliable boxer will beat an quite reliable shaolin gung fu practitioner the place all different issues are equivalent. i'm no longer asserting there are not superb martial artists on the shaolin side yet diverse what I even have seen has been faraway from the reality of two human beings attempting to do severe injury to a minimum of one yet another. while boxers tend to be o.k. conditioned and that they might take a punch and save combating.

Answer 8

The boxer would die in the first few seconds. poor guy doesn't have a weapon.

I would probably go with the ninja, just because of the three he is the only one who has both a ranged weapon and a melee weapon as part of his normal armament. The gladiator would have a fair chance too. Shields were used for thousands of years for a reason.

Answer 9

the monk would have a sore *** because the others woulda well and truly f....d him,the gladiator woulda been waiting for russell crowe to tell him how to fight,the ninja would be still trying to figure out how to be invisible or how to fly,so that only leaves the boxer and he couldn't win either because he'd have to be an aussie and no aussie would get involved in such ****.oh well maybe if there was a beer involved somewhere.and the winner is don king cause he woulda promoted it,and he'd win anyway for best haircut.

Answer 10

Gladiator & probably the Ninja have the advantage of carrting weapons. Without weapons, the monk would win easily. If the Ninja has projectile weapons he propably wins.