For now, I will follow Brother William of Ockham's lex parsimoniae teaching and say that I see no need for a god but I am open to other opinions. I don't ask for much. Thomas - one of the twelve who had followed Jesus, lived with him, heard him preach, saw his miracles, and even received the first communion directly from him - Thomas did not believe until he was allowed to touch the wounds of the risen Jesus.
If Thomas is in heaven, then I have to assume I'm going to get my chance to see proof before I'm condemned. As soon as I see the proof, I'll change my mind. It doesn't have to be the actual stigmata, I'll make do with a burning bush.
If I'm wrong, why? If Thomas was allowed wait for proof, why not me (and you, and all of us)? Why save him, one of the twelve people who should have had faith, despite his lack of faith and condemn me?
2007-01-03
10:07:31
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Dave P
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Let me add that I can accept that those who believe without proof get the good pews. My question is purely about condemnation. Thomas asked for proof and was given it, when the time comes I will ask for the same deal.
2007-01-03
10:26:02 ·
update #1