You do realize I can say this exact same thing about Zeus, Mithras, Thor, Santa and The Original Pink Bowl Of Chicken Soup Goddess, right?
2007-01-03 07:42:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
8⤊
0⤋
There aren't any cogent observations in any of what you said. The same sorts of observations could be made to any number of things.
God doesn't like to go back? Based on what? How do you know space extends infinitely? Gravity affects everyone, but in varying degrees - is a person who lives in Vermont more blessed than a person in Florida?
Second problem is, you're assuming that the Bible is the be all and end all of religion. Of course, it's not. The principles taught in that book are themes in all other religions, as well.
2007-01-03 15:44:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Prakash V 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
But all that only matters or makes sense if you already believe in God. I don't find any reason to believe in the Bible over any other Holy Book for any other religion. If there is a God, he has not made himself apparent for a long time and has never been explained properly or known by anyone. He is waaaaay too humanized in the Bible to be infinitely wise (vengefulness is a fault, not a characteristic of an all knowing all loving wise super-being). It just doesn't seem plausible to me, sorry. I'll give you a thumbs up for effort though.
2007-01-03 15:55:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
What a load of worthless gibberish.
Where shall I start? The universe is infinite so god is? What kind of argument is that? Current theories indicate that the observable universe is 13.7 billion light years across. If it was infinite it couldn't have been expanding could it because it would by definition already take up all possible space.
Planets conform to the suns gravity? Well actually planets pull on the sun as well - extra-solar planets are detected precisely because of the wobble they put in their stars orbit by pulling on it as they go around.
Do you honestly think these things prove God's existence... Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic.
2007-01-03 15:42:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
God is one. He can not be put into human form. He is so pure and big that he would destroy any human form. If a man can't look on the face of G-d and live, how could G-d go into human form? It is against His own nature to do that. Next, He never said he was a trinity. You are going from a New Testament point of view and alot of people do not believe in the New Testament so you cant convince them by using it as your source of information. G-d told us that prophets can be trusted if they keep to his laws and according to his word. Many men have not done that so we know they are false prophets because of that very thing. It is clear that G-d did not abandon heaven, he can not be afraid, he can not be ill, he can not be tired, he can not pray to himself from a garden and if he did, What kind of a sacrafice was it? It is not much of a sacrafice to give up your life if you know you will get it back a couple of days later. G-d is God and there is only one.
2007-01-03 15:46:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well then, why don't you accept that the FAITH and OBSERVATION method has led me to the conclusion that Christianity is absolutely not the true path and that Wicca is a much more calm, rational and peaceful path for me to follow, one that has nothing whatsoever to do with Satan (whom you and your brethren invented to keep people in line 2000+ years ago)? Why do you believe that all faith and observation must necessarily bring everyone on the planet to Christianity - a single-parent, lopsided religion that encourages adults to behave like children, who have neither the capacity to reason out things for themselves nor the ability to take care of themselves and their lives without help from Daddy?
)O(
2007-01-03 15:52:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by wyvern1313 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I am not a non-believer. I am just a believer in a religion other than Christianity.
Your question answers itself. You ask, when we boil down all the quotes, the question why don't non-Christians believe the inspired word of the Bible. Well, because that's not their sacred book.
Another way of answering your question is by asking in response:
Non-Hindus, in the Bhagavad-Gita the Lord Krsna makes plain the union of Atman and Brahman as the highest goal of the Self. Why, if the sacred scripture of the Gita is so clear, do you persist in not accepting this as true?
Non-Muslims, in the Koran Allah, the Great, the Compassionate, the Merciful, Himself through the Angel Gabriel has told the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) the way of submission to the will of Allah for all humankind. Why, since the Koran is inspired by Allah Himself, do you not believe?
See my point? The Bible only has evidentiary value for those for whom it is their sacred book. It has no special powers for those in another faith tradition.
Hope this helps.
2007-01-03 15:45:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by snowbaal 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
God never mentioned the Trinity. The word Trinity is not in the bible. The Trinity was introduced in the 4th century. The doctrine of the Trinity is the result of continuous exploration by the church of the biblical data, thrashed out in debate and treatises, eventually formulated in a way they believe is consistent with the biblical witness at the First Council of Nicaea in 325 CE, and further refined in later councils and writings.
2007-01-03 15:41:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
We don't accept your god because there's no evidence for your god. Did you not read the other 5 million answers to this outdated question?
"God says He is Tri or Trinity;Elements have three states"
Wrong. Matter has four states: solid, liquid, gas, plasma
"God Has no start or end:Space has no start or end,but extends infinitly"
Wrong. The universe is expanding, thus it cannot be assumed to be infinite.
"God affects everybody;Gravity affects everybody."
Except Superman.
A bunch of poorly-constructed coincidental analogies do not prove your god to be real, and neither do Bible verses.
Present empirical evidence for your god, or step down off of your soapbox.
2007-01-03 15:43:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
You know, you ask the same stupid question over and over and if I see you doing it again I'll report you. It's really tedious. Using the observation method is half of why I DUMPED your religions, except if the answer doesn't fit what YOU think the answer should be, you claim it should fall back on faith. Talk about a really stick-your-head-in-the-sand approach! Whew.
2007-01-03 15:45:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
5⤊
0⤋