No matter how unlikely something is a creator will always be more complex and so more unlikely. The argument from design simply doesn't work as an infinite god is far less probable than an infinite universe which you have said is already so complex it can‘t exist.
2007-01-03 07:26:37 · 14 answers · asked by Say no to jesus 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Did people not bother reading this or are they just chronically stupid? Read it again if you think it's an attack on evolution, read it again if you think it shows that evolution isn't true, read it again if you think that it supports god. What it says is god is more complex than the world so god is less likely than the world. But you are probably too stupid to understand that.
2007-01-03 07:34:51 · update #1
The boeing airplane analogy is laughable. Nobody has every claims that inorganic parts made of metal and plastic and whatever could every "grow" into an airplane. Inorganic molecules, however, have certain properties that make them do interesting stuff.
As to the "nothing comes from nothing so everything has to have a creator" argument. It is a paradox since it insists that the creator can not possibly exist unless he was created.
2007-01-03 07:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by Alan 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Creationists say that some things are too complex to have come into existence by themselves. They cite the universe as an example. However, a creator would necessarily have had to be more complex than the universe, showing that by the previous argument the creator had to have a creator, ad infinitum.
2007-01-03 07:34:31 · answer #2 · answered by Incoherent Fool 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well it's been proven by your scientists that for this earth to exist at the perfect distance from the son and thousands of other conditions for life to exist would be like your analogy of a hurricane going through a scrap yard and produce a Boeing factory. That's how improbable for this world to be without external help.
2007-01-03 07:34:49 · answer #3 · answered by fdhgasehrt t 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Boeing 747 analogy is from Fred Hoyle who taught astronomy at Cambridge. He was an atheist.
"Hoyle compared the random emergence of even the simplest cell to the likelihood that "a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein." Hoyle also compared the chance of obtaining even a single functioning protein by chance combination of amino acids to a solar system full of blind men solving Rubik's Cube simultaneously."
Wiki
2007-01-03 07:29:57 · answer #4 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is idiots like you who are too stupid to grasp the simplest concept that the truth will forever be closed to. There is not the slightest reason to try and explain anything to a closed mind like yours. Thank God the younger folks still have a chance and only the very dense ones will you be able to drag down in the hole with you. xx
2007-01-03 07:36:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Having worked in a Boeing factory, I'd have to say that the end result of what you propose might be safer. KIDDING. Boeing is a great company.
Evolution is the real joke.
2007-01-03 07:34:26 · answer #6 · answered by cornbread 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is far more likely than something out of nothing without there being a creator. Silly rabbit, your question just verifies that evolution is a joke. YBIC
2007-01-03 07:31:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Honey, you contradict yourself. Do you really think that the Big Bang is likely??? Just look around you -- at the human brain, processes of the earth, the way animals care for themselves, plants, whatever, how can that have all come about by a big coincidental explosion??
2007-01-03 07:30:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You are not making much sense.
No, a hurricane can't make a Boeing factory.
And so then, how can evolution, which is chaos and disorder, create design.
2007-01-03 07:31:07 · answer #9 · answered by . 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
A creation takes a creator.
2007-01-03 07:29:49 · answer #10 · answered by RB 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋