Slow burn. You really get to know the person.
2007-01-03 01:31:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Black Like A Tar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They both are cool. It just depends on the lovers involved. Some relationships start off friends, but then end up more solid than most marriages, and other relationships may just end up without anything left after having a whole lot of "sparks" or vice versa. Love is just Love, no matter how it becomes within two lovers. Things just are....
2007-01-03 09:37:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Justcool 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I rather hope you can have both!! The spark and then the slow burn whilst getting to know someone and spending lots of time together after the initial spark.
2007-01-03 09:35:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by girly girl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
From my experience definitely slow burn, just wait for the quick spark to start, then there's no going back.
2007-01-03 09:32:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by JillPinky 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Slow burn... it lasts longer! Maybe a slow burn with sparks thrown in would be really nice!
2007-01-03 09:31:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jo_Diva 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is no best because it all depends on what the two people want from it slow start or quick burn if its going to work it will or it wont so really no winner
2007-01-03 09:44:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by rabbit18 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, if you are staring a car a quick spark would be better. If you are trying to light a stick of dynamite, then a slow burn would be better.
2007-01-03 09:32:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by DON J 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
A quick spark is more explosive and doesn't fizzle out like a damp squib.
2007-01-03 09:34:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a quick spark for it to be real love!
2007-01-03 09:45:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need a spark to start the fire!
2007-01-03 09:32:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋