Please provide some concise (that means short and to the point) evidence for Creation, whatever method you choose. Please also provide a source for further reading on that evidence.
Something in this sort of fashion would be prefered:
My evidence is this.....
Source: http://somesite.com/creation.php
I would prefer if people refrain from using Biblical quotes, references to either Answers in Genesis, Creation Evidence.org, Harun Yaya(spelling?), any Dr Dino/Kent Hovind sites or any other blatant propaganda.
Also, please do not submit answers disclaiming creationism or promoting evolution. While I am open minded and educated enough to know that evolution has evidence, this is not the place.
Thank you.
2007-01-02
21:34:19
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Mufasa: I am not asking for evidence of a god or gods, I am asking for evidence that matches any creation story. If you have evidence for the Adam & Eve story, then please provide it.
2007-01-02
21:39:02 ·
update #1
Note: the link I provided was part of the example - it doesn't really lead anywhere.
2007-01-02
21:39:57 ·
update #2
I'm not sure if I need to point this out, but personal opinions are not proof of anything. Please refrain from posting them.
2007-01-02
21:41:31 ·
update #3
its just like the christians come up with a new clock to change time and history to suit them selves to make a fairy tale work it just shows what control freaks thay are just because thay can not have things there way
2007-01-02 22:28:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
In 1987, a team at the University of California at Berkeley published a study comparing the mtDNA of 147 people from five of the world’s geographic locations.They concluded that all 147 had the same female ancestor. She is now called “the mitochondrial Eve.”
A greater surprise, even disbelief, occurred in 1997, when it was announced that mutations in mtDNA occur 20 times more rapidly than had been estimated. Without assuming that humans and chimpanzees had a common ancestor 5 million years ago or that Australia was populated 40,000 years ago, mutation rates can now be determined directly by comparing the mtDNA of many mother-child pairs. Using the new, more accurate rate, mitochondrial Eve lived only about 6,500 years ago.
"Regardless of the cause, evolutionists are most concerned about the effect of a faster mutation rate. For example, researchers have calculated [previously] that ‘mitochondrial Eve’—the woman whose mtDNA was ancestral to that in all living people—lived 100,000 to 200,000 years ago in Africa. Using the new clock, she would be a mere 6000 years old.” Ann Gibbons, “Calibrating the Mitochondrial Clock,” Science, Vol. 279
2007-01-03 06:03:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Serena 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
You may find this link interesting http://www.halos.com/
However, there is a book I can recommend to you, as a growing number of students are buying this book and indeed using it to question their science teachers. You would agree, it's healthy at times to question and view both sides.
The book is called "Refuting Evolution" by Jonathan Sarfati.
Please, also check out a man called Dr Gary Parker. My reasons for this is, he is an ex evolutionist and one of the top he was too. Causing many a student to break down in tears in his classroom, due to his excellent knowledge of science and his belief in evolution, which destroyed many a students faith in the bible/creation. However, he himself, over the years came to believe in Creationism, you may find his story interesting as to "why". You could check him outline yourself if you're interested.
But again, sorry for not being as brief as I could have been nor providing more or better links, as my reading and info on this, has not been internet related. Book material and video, plus video debates on both creation and evolution.
Cheers and hope someone else might come up with a better link on here for you.
2007-01-03 05:45:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gus 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Creationism. There is a definite order to the cosmos, it's bizarre to think that something so miraculous as life could simply haphazardly happen. Since the Universe is rational, and follows definite rules of gravity and mathematics, it stands to reason that the universe was created by something that was reasonable--a system builder. If you ask an evolutionist what came first, the chicken or the egg, the evolutionist will undoubtedly say the egg, because a different bird laid it. Using their own line of reasoning, what came first? Reason or the rational universe? Undoubtedly the universe was created by a different reason, and this is just a whole new bird.
2007-01-03 05:39:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
your source link doesnt work..it says error when i press it, just so you know...so you can fix it before the mob comes to attack you
ps- if the link you added was part of an example and didnt lend anywhere then why add it, it just made you look like you have no proof for anything and are just trying to start fights..i actually pressed hoping to find some sort of truth but once again disappointed by nothingness......
but anyways i get what you were doing ha,
as for proof of creationism i have nothing just a bunch of questions without answers
2007-01-03 05:37:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by heather feather 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Unless you have a belief in God, it is pointless to try and offer proof of creationism. You're basically asking for proof that God exists. That, my friend, is something you must have in your heart of hearts. God is not something that can be proved scientifically.
Addition: Again... unless a person has faith in God (i.e. The God of Abraham) then asking for proof in creationism is invalid. Do you believe in the God of Abraham?
2007-01-03 05:37:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mustafa 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
the leaves sway in the slightly salty air, hanging from a fig tree branch and the man could not but think......"that is but a simple creation, true, but as beautiful as my own thought could create, and then some." and the sound echoed for whomever could hear. and the man was amazed at how it all worked. but just could not decifer it completely.
2007-01-03 05:46:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Carcin Ogin 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
ya but creation has evidence as well
2007-01-03 05:37:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by THE WAR WRENCH 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
We have plenty of proof for evolution anyway
2007-01-03 05:41:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by The atheist revolutionary 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
This one is interesting...
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/TechnicalNotes2.html
2007-01-03 05:45:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pilgrim 4
·
2⤊
0⤋