No. When I worked in a hospital during the Northridge quake. I saw nore dead in the back of my hospital than was reported for the entire L.A. county. When the power were cut in the hospital a lot of people died that was hooked up to some machine. They was categorized differently to make death look lower than it really was. I'm sure the military use the same technique.
2007-01-02 18:56:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Other than classified operations, the government doesn't lie about casualty reports, and really has no reason to. Even with classified operations they usally release as much information as they can as soon as they can.
They may not be timely, since reports like that can sometimes compromise ongoing operations, but they are required to report them eventually.
But that's casualty reports for our own soldiers. Reports of enemy losses are usually estimated based on reports by the soldiers involved.
2007-01-02 18:54:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Glaeal 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
WW a million became a particular case through trench conflict and the utter destruction and or lack of many bodies. visit Verdun, the large French battlefield the position the most important monument if a stone cylinder packed with elementary bones. all the web content had great numbers of "unknown" useless marked through great monuments. Even at present protection force casualty figures for both wars are unreliable, and in many circumstances unknown as to Russian causalities. So too the pink military did not count number Nazi casualties interior the jap the front, basically the destruction of military units as an complete.there's a thriving employer find German graves on Russian soil, and identifying to purchase a cost for his or her elimination to Germany. in the course of the time, approximate figures were anticipated as enemy losses in some great set-piece battles, regardless of the indisputable fact that the Allies more desirable typically than not refused to launch any casualty figures previous death notices provided to the relatives, typically with obscured or very regular places of the death referred to. deliver losses were treated otherwise, of route, at the same time as ships were sunk and bodies undiscovered. "the united statesxxx became lost in operations interior the South Pacific, and its crew of xxx is presumed to were lost."
2016-10-16 23:11:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no i dont and to be honest casualties are not that high in this war. consider other wars or battles for that matter. D day for example had 8000 casulties and about 3000 fatalities. if you look at other wars this wars deaths are nothing. sorry for branching off topic a bit but this war is better fought over there then letting the iraqis try to defend the country and let it deterioate into a worst case vietnam scenario after we left.
2007-01-02 19:26:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by lost 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way, the government I think ALWAYS downplay the actual number of casualties, simply because it doesn't bode well in the eye of the public to see too many of their loved ones getting killed.
Also, it makes them look bad and incompetant.
2007-01-02 23:59:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No they are not accurate, and the more reliable news broadcasters tell you that the #'s that they give you are only a certain percent accurate.
2007-01-02 18:53:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by princessaris80 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
"green card" soldiers? What the hell is that?
2007-01-02 22:33:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, we can't rely on them 100%.
2007-01-02 18:50:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by yvetski 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, they are right.
2007-01-02 19:22:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Curt 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No I don't .
2007-01-02 19:17:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋