I did not mean from a religeous perspective ,but rather from a linguistic side of view
2007-01-02 17:51:28 · 17 answers · asked by botta 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
NORMAL
2007-01-02 17:59:40 · answer #1 · answered by Rockies VM 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gullible, not playing with a full deck, a few sandwiches short of a picnic, a brain only a preacher could love, knows something is happening here but don't know what it is, clueless as Clouseau on a bad day, would rather talk to the dead than the living, the con man's friend, et cetera!
2007-01-02 18:42:46 · answer #2 · answered by hznfrst 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand your Q at all. If it walks like a duck, waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck; then it's usually a duck.
How does linguistics come into it? The person is superstitious. That's it.
Unless the writer is telling lies about himself. That's all I can see in it.
2007-01-02 18:23:44 · answer #3 · answered by Blah Blah 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Departing from what is usual or normal especially so as to appear to transcend the laws of nature or attributed to an invisible agent (as a ghost or spirit)
2007-01-02 17:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by Wabbit 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mother-in-law.
2007-01-02 18:11:06 · answer #5 · answered by BuddyL 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Holy roller
2007-01-02 17:58:41 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Super man
2007-01-02 17:59:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
A sister-in-law.
2007-01-02 17:58:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Superstitious or supernaturalist
2007-01-02 17:59:24 · answer #9 · answered by ok_go_kid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A nut
2007-01-02 17:59:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Supernaturalist like that show haha
2007-01-02 17:54:53 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋