2007-01-02 15:13:34 · 7 answers · asked by Gregory_s........ 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
That assumes the reasoning is logical.
I don't accept that assumption as true.
"Intelligent design" isn't a scientific theory.
2007-01-02 15:17:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't know all of the logical reasoning applied in the design argument so I couldn't say for certain.
From what I do understand though, it relies on irredcuible complexity, and seems to be a claim that there is a level of complexity in organisms that cannot have come about by natural forces.
This reasoning seems to be lacking in that sufficient experimentation has not been completed to show that such complexity cannot come about naturally. Indeed, some proteins and such have been created in the laboratory suggesting that over time they can occur naturally. Reason might dictate that further expirementation should be done before proclaiming something possible, impossible or unprovable.
2007-01-02 23:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by Deirdre H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you would have to define logical reasoning to know if it applied for you and me. Since we may have very different views on logic
2007-01-02 23:19:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
The proof and evidence is all around you and everywhere, undeniable proof, and indisputable visible evidence. It is called creation and life. Unless your are blind, deaf, and senseless. You can see, smell, taste, hear, feel, and examine the evidence.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
We live on a planet teeming with life. Plant life with approximately 250,000 species, animal life with over a million species. Scientists are learning just how complex life is. So complex that it requires design. The evidence of design requires a designer. Scientists are also learning the conditions for life; just how perfect conditions here on planet Earth are to support all this life.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
The human brain, it absorbs forty megabytes per second of data while awake. That is two terabytes of data a day. At night, it sorts and stores that data through the creation of new chemical bonds and synaptic connectors.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
Sure, right, this all just happened and evolved. This sort of thinking takes considerable faith, exponentially more faith than believing in a creator.
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
Reason away.
2007-01-02 23:15:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
OPEN your eyes...if you can see design all around you in creation....I suggest you get a seeing eye dog.
2007-01-02 23:17:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not in the least, and it really didn't take Einstein to figure it out.
2007-01-02 23:15:43 · answer #6 · answered by distind 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Most scientists don't think so.
2007-01-02 23:16:09 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋