I'm planning on a trip to Europe this spring and I'm definitely going to Paris and Rome, but I can't decide if I should go to London or Amsterdam. If anyone has been to both, which place is more fun to visit?
2007-01-02 14:43:31 · 11 answers · asked by Wonderazz 1 in Travel ➔ Travel (General) ➔ Other - Destinations
I liked London much better than Amsterdam for several reasons....1- London is much larger and has so much more diversity .....Amsterdam is actually quite a tiny little city by comparison.....lovely but tiny ....on the other hand you'd better be prepared to dig pretty deep for London ....it is the singularly most God awfully expensive city I have ever visited....shocking really....so , do your homework on London for sure .....2- London is FUN .....people there are just really groovy.....Amsterdam is alright but people are more reserved ....not at all shy ...just reserved ....
Personally , I'd go to Paris and never leave ....mais, c'est moi
2007-01-02 14:53:02 · answer #1 · answered by Papillion 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are both great places...Amsterdam is more "colorful" with the relaxed drug and prostitution laws. London is more serious by comparison, but both are great cities with lots of history and loads of things to do. I'd suggest you get a couple of guide books from your library and read about each city. You'll start to get a feel for which you really long to see. One warning about London--it's hugely expensive, and that might effect your decision regarding how long you stay.
2007-01-03 06:17:51 · answer #2 · answered by jonahbeast 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on your kind of fun. If you want to have sex with minors and smoke pot, go to Amsterdam. London has some cool history. The food sucks in both places.
2007-01-02 14:59:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amsterdam if you like to smoke lol. Really though I like Amsterdam for other reasons. They got some great museums there, good food, laid back atmosphere, coffee(smoke) shops. Great live music scene, People on bicycles everywhere, legalize prostitutes in the red light district, cheese, wooden shoes,
http://www.holland.com/amsterdam/gb/
London is expensive and to me more like the USA in many ways.
2007-01-02 14:49:48 · answer #4 · answered by bob K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Amsterdam is a wide spectral range of attractions for recreational and cultural sightseeing. They vary from interesting old houses, just like the Oude Kerk, to oddities such as the Hash
2016-12-16 14:13:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
london is a great place. especially if you want to visit historical sites. amsterdam to me was very boring. had very little to do. but im leaning more towards london.
2007-01-02 14:47:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
London because Amsterdam is full of hookers. So I hear.
2007-01-02 14:50:36 · answer #7 · answered by 10 to 20 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have been to both, I like London better but Amsterdam is really cool too if u know wat i mean, since everything is legal there...
2007-01-02 14:48:34 · answer #8 · answered by sioky t 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
london
2007-01-02 16:43:02 · answer #9 · answered by nice too meet you. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of each and every week is stable sufficient for you and your pal to locate those 3 great cities in Europe. you're able to examine in KLM, Airfrance or British Air for the main inexpensive trip equipment.
2016-10-06 08:56:41 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋