Can E=mc2 prove GOD's existence? Please read before answering.?

Question

I believe so.

The most famous and powerful equation given by one of the most, if not --THE MOST-- influencial and genius of all geniuses, Albert Einstein, can infact prove GOD's existence.

The equation states that energy (E) is in direct proportionate (equivalent) to the mass (m) to the square of the speed of light in a vacuum (c2). In other words, mass is equal to energy. Thus, this gives rise to the theory of Conservation of Energy, which states that energy can not be created nor destroyed and it can only be converted from one form to another. If this holds true, then the question that immediately comes in play is where did the energy come from/ initiate?

Like everything in the world, it had a beginning, just as the universe had. The formation of energy had to have a initiation point in which it was first created, and the only plausible answer is: GOD.

It's facinating how the Big Bang Theory and this equation so beautifully compliments one another.

According to the Big Bang Theory the universe had a beginning and energy is contained/exists in the universe, then how do you explain "eternal existence"? It just does not make sence. Universe and energy are a unit of one, if one had a begnning then the other must have had a beginning as well, therefore, the question of eternal exictence is out of the view.

Thus, it becomes an invalid answer.

Om: I don't think things can happen out of thin air. Like the saying goes: cause and effect and vise versa. There is always a cause in everything, if there was no cause in creation, then the theory of function to design, which is rudimentary to biology will also be invalid. But that's not the case in reality. I refuse to take side on spontanity.

Om: P.S - No need to explian why gravity is negative, I think I'm well aware of the derivation of the equation.Thank you very much.

addicted to answers: I'm not here to joke, and my question isn't a joke. Hasn't your mom ever taught you to respect other's opinion? Clearly not. Please don't be poke fun when answering, it is a matter of etiquette, obviously you lack in this department.

I'm not Christian, I'M MUSLIM.

ndmagicman: Point out one thing I've stated was false/feeble to science. One thing....

ndmagicman or whatever...: Wise guy, you spelled "feeble" wrong. So much for the brownies... it's ironic how I'm eating browines as I'm typing... lol.

Answer 1

I disagree. I propose that the energy of the universe wasn't "formed", but has always existed, and is infinitely converting itself from energy to matter, and back again.

Or, that energy is an illusionary byproduct of our sentience.

Or, that the birth of the universe was actually the death of god.

Or, that there are an infinite number of universes, spawned by an infinte number of gods.

Do you see how silly four-dimensional thinking is.

Humans are not evolved enough to understand more than the three physical dimensions and time (being the 4th), so it is pointless to continue to try and describe the birth of the universe as an event... least of all with our primitive, human science.

Answer 2

1) Nothing can prove a god's existence.
2) You stated the universe had a beginning... if it was created by a god... who created that god and gave Him a beginning? What about that second guy? It's never ending... there's no beginning with gods so you just fell into your own trap.
3) God is not the only plausible answer... in fact... it's not even an answer because it answers nothing (as I show in #2) and it leaves more questions (again, shown in #2).
4) It's fascinating how you miss the obvious.
5) BTW: Albert Einstein was not a Christian. He only believed in Spinova's God (an impersonal god) that relates to nature.

Answer 3

Actually, I agree with you there. This isn't really a question, so I'll give you a not really answer, just adding more information to your knowledge. If you apply String Theory to the Big Bang, and we count backwards creating a time line to the moment it occured, we find all of our science, even Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity begin to fall apart, and no longer work. We completely lose track of the time line and the state of the universe at that time at less than a second after the Big Bang. Coincidence?

Answer 4

So where did god from? And how did he get the energy? You don't answer a thing that way. It is circular logic.

What the equation really says is that matter and energy are just different forms of the same thing. You can just say the universe was always here in some form. If pressed you say the same thing about god, but you added a step with no evidence to back it up.

Answer 5

Actually, the only plausible answer is not God. There are numerous scientific theories about the "initiation point" of the creation of the universe. Just because we don't currently have a concrete scientific explanation for how it all happened, does not mean that one does not exist. Think of all the things that have been explained by science that people hundreds or thousands of years ago (and many still do today) attributed to "God": birth, death, thunder, fire, etc. Hopefully, we'll still be around to find out that scientific explanation for the "meaning of life" .

Answer 6

If you do some physics, you will find that gravitational potential energy is actually negative energy. This means that if you add up all the energy in the universe, it could turn out as 0, therefore violating no laws. How did this start... well thats the beauty of quantum theory, on a very small scale, things can happen with no cause.

Answer 7

Don't get me wrong, I believe in God. But E=mc2 doesn't prove God. The fact is, energy did not cause the Big Bang, it was the opposite. While I believe God caused the Big Bang, that is an issue of religion, not science. It can't be proven, at least not right now and probably never.

Answer 8

This equation then doesn't eliminate the possibility that in some form, matter could exist eternally.

Edit:
The Big Bang only says that the universe in this particular form had a beginning. It doesn't rule out the existence of some form of matter prior to the big bang. Also, the Law of the Conservation of Mass/Energy applies to this universe - not necessarily any prior forms.

Answer 9

It is likely the total amount of energy in the universe is zero. As long as the amount of positive energy matches the amount of negative energy, energy is conserved. The rapid inflation following the big bang event, produced huge amounts of both negative gravitational potential energy and the positive mass/ energy we see in every day life.

You are basically arguing from ignorance. You don't understand modern cosmology so god must have done it. As one who has actually studied graduate level cosmology and general relativity I have no such limitations.

Instead of needing to manufacture a magical being, for which you cannot possibly explain how it got here, I prefer to believe our existence is simply the result of necessary mathematics. In fact, Quite possibly we ourselves and the reality we find ourselves in are in fact necessary mathematics.

Maybe if one called mathematics itself god, then I might call myself a theist instead of an atheist, but mathematics meets none of the typical definitions of a god. Certainly it would be a waste of time praying to mathematics. Nor do I believe math creates reality. Instead I believe mathematics is itself reality, and the reason it looks like nature rather than math is because we see nature from within itself rather than from outside itself.

Answer 10

Consider this............everything has an equal and opposite reaction so if this were true then God created the energy and the energy created something else, maybe not necessarily what it was trying to create in the first place, which would also explain the big bang theory and alot of other things like why is the moon where it is and why does it seem like it was put there after the fact. Maybe God did make mistakes and he had to fix it best he could. He created us in his image-maybe so we could fix things too...........wow this is even to deep thought for me.