they couldnt have came to the ark, and how the hell did he get the sharks, whales, giant squids? wtf, s h i t like this makes me think God is tha false god!! maybe ill turn to the islam, or budist?
2007-01-02 13:03:19 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
this is what's known as a trick question
2007-01-02 13:07:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Three problems with your logic.
A) The water animals wouldn't be bothered by such a flood and would be able to survive, but you probably already knew this one.
B) The Islamic religion I believe uses the same story.
C) The Bible and other religious texts aren't always meant to be taken literally. The tale of Noah's Ark and the big flood that wiped out all the other living things was most likely symbolism for an actual event, but a giant flood and an ark with two of each animal was probably just for dramatic effect.
2007-01-02 21:07:38 · answer #2 · answered by locomonohijo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hello =)
What need would there have been to bring them upon the ark??
Being that the world was deluged, and that water covered the known earth, and water animals were capable of swimming??
One does not usually need be concerned about fish drowning, after all......
I'm sure that in that event, which likely did take place, whether one believes in Noah or not, the water animals were just fine. It was the land animals that were of great concern. Even then, the entirety of the planet was not covered with water, merely the "known world"...... In Islam, also, there are tales of the great deluge.
Buddhism has no particular legend, although the Brahminism, from which Buddhism springs did have such a legend, in which the creator, Brahma, watched with apathy, as the earth sank into the ocean, not really knowing what to do. A giant boar, named sveta issued forth out of his nostril, and with his great boar tusks, lifted the earth out of the deluge.
So, no matter which religion you choose, you cannot escape the legend of the great flood, it seems.
Namaste, and Happy New Year,
--Tom
2007-01-02 21:11:29 · answer #3 · answered by glassnegman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, that's an interesting question. I would doubt it, but maybe.
The funny thing is, you say you might turn Islamic or Buddhist, but not to go to something. Only to run from something else.
Well, anytime you're ready, there is a true, living, God ready to have a relationship with you.
2007-01-02 21:10:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the water animals needed to be on the ark sweety because there water animals they belong in the water and thats exactly where they were in the water please don't turn to another religion for something so stupid. God Bless you Jesus loves you.
2007-01-02 21:06:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He didnt capture water animals. Why would he it was like a big party for them!
2007-01-02 21:05:40 · answer #6 · answered by vollballroxsmysox 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The water animals were already in water; a little more water wouldn't have killed them, and they didn't really need any saving.
2007-01-02 21:07:48 · answer #7 · answered by AskerOfQuestions 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He didn't, he did not have too. The world was filled of water. Stop being ignoran and use the common since you were born with.
Psa 119:130 The entrance of thy words giveth light; it giveth understanding unto the simple.
2007-01-02 21:06:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's not God that's false, it's people. The God of the Bible isn't real, but that doesn't mean there is no god at all.
2007-01-02 21:05:41 · answer #9 · answered by Huddy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some band in a small yellow submarine took care of them.
2007-01-02 21:07:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's too bad he had to go and let the morons on board. If he would have just let them drown we could avoid questions like this.
2007-01-02 21:08:32 · answer #11 · answered by marklemoore 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋