How do you infidels say the Bible is wrong when the bible says that the bible's right? If the bible says that the bible is right than the bible must be right because the bible says that the bible is right and the bible is right because it says that it's right. Therefore the Bible is right.
...i dunno I just feel like bein' an a**hole for some reason
2007-01-02 12:38:34 · 30 answers · asked by ? 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
it's a joke...CALM THE F**K DOWN!!
i'm an a**hole okay?
2007-01-02 12:41:54 · update #1
I AM an agnostic you know.
2007-01-02 12:45:42 · update #2
why don't you folks get the joke?
I AM AN AGNOSTIC NOT A CHRISTIAN!!
2007-01-02 12:49:23 · update #3
Look at what you started. Got all these people all ready to tear someone apart because of the very silly reasoning portrayed here. rofl!!! Good one.
2007-01-02 13:08:24 · answer #1 · answered by Kithy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, I'm not an atheist, becuase I'm only 13 and haven't the life experiance to decide things like this (my family's Christain).
You still don't have the right to insult other religions like this, how would you feel if somebody said: The Bible is the stupidist book written?
Bad, right? Well, if Atheists don't think the Bible is right, then the Bible saying it is right would seem wrong, if I am making any sense. If you don't believe in something, then you wouldn't assume that it was right, even if it said so.
Everybody is entitled to their own, and so are you, but that was rude.
2007-01-02 12:43:57 · answer #2 · answered by Becky 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Do they?
The Bible contains too many subjects to generalize like this.
What I observe is that the rational and studious atheist I know is that they accept many things in the Bible. That many things are correct.
Just a few examples of many:
In the Old Testament:
1. The existence of the city of Ur is scientifically proved (Genesis 11:31)
2. The Arabs are descents of Ismael, son of Abraham (Genesis 25:12)
3. The Hittites existed (Genesis 25:10)
4. The Hebrew people are descendants of Sem (look yourself now)
5. The documents, manuscripts, etc., which gave origin to the Bible are authentic (meaning that they were really written thousands of years ago and that many historical and geographical aspects have been proven correct), etc.
In the N. T.:
1. Herodes existed
2. Bethlehem existed (and does until today)
3. Pilatus existed and was governor in Judea
4. Rome existed and is there until today
5. Jerusalem existed and is there til today
These are very few and naive examples given just to show how this generalization is completely off...
But I know that you just want to make fun of Jews and Christian. In my humble opinion, you are entitled to YOUR fun.
As I am entitled to respect, love this marvellous book and to consider it to contain "The Word of God".
Peace...
2007-01-02 13:16:10 · answer #3 · answered by Vovó (Grandma) 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's because there is no direct proveable statements in there. Proveable means verifiable from another source.
And so it is written all mention of Moses be erased from the stones and papyruses of Egypt, (so too was it for everybody else mentioned in the Bible.
So, of course the storytellers story is the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Remember the story about that big fish that swallow a man whole?
2007-01-02 13:00:22 · answer #4 · answered by ButwhatdoIno? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You definitely reached your goal.
So, if I say the sky is yellow, and I say that I'm right, does that mean its true???? Ummm... no.
I'm not Athiest. I consider myself Agnostic, because I really don't know the answer. But, I find it hard to put all of my faith into a book that some guy wrote thousands of years ago in a completely different language.
2007-01-02 12:43:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
LOL, if someone wrote a book and said that they were right when they said that dinasaurs still roam the earth, but they said it in the book that they were right, does that still mean they are right? It's in the book, so they must be right, dinosaurs do still roam the earth. Be extra careful, those T-Rexes could chomp you in half without even trying.
2007-01-02 12:46:57 · answer #6 · answered by sweetgurl13069 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A conundrum without an answer.
Faith is based on belief and not fact.
In the case of pure logic, it is impossible to prove or disprove.
Just because a proposition has never been proven true does not ipso facto mean that it is false. And vice-versa.
This fallacy you describe is used when people try to shift the burden of proof from themselves back to their opponent.
We're left with an endless debate because there is no "fact" we can use to solve it.
2007-01-02 12:43:20 · answer #7 · answered by JC 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I just wrote a book that says that the book that I just wrote is right and that the bible is wrong.
2007-01-02 12:41:04 · answer #8 · answered by Nick F 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I fully agree. The only problem is: when I bought my Bible, I found it in the fiction-section of the local bookstore. So, I'm still not sure.
2007-01-02 12:41:12 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sounds like 700 Club-grade logic to me! Congrats!
2007-01-02 12:42:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋