It's sad to state that religion without science is blind, and sience without religion is lame.?

Question

Bible contains no scientific knowledge at all?

Answer 1

Sciences such as mathematics, biology, physics, chemistry are truths, but they are a lower truth than the truth of God which is the highest truth.

Answer 2

Well you should have taken that up with Einstein while he was here. From what I can read of him he did believe that an intelligence was behind creation. He was not a religious but he had many questions and thoughts about the intelligence behind creation. He never said the Bible had no scientific knowledge but it was really not written along the lines that a scientist would investigate. There are some that see science in the Bible but the wording is such that many different people get many different things out of it.

Answer 3

I agree with your first statement, but not with the second. The Bible is not meant to be a science text book, but it does contain some scientific facts when they are pertinent to its main message.

Answer 4

No, science holds answers based on the observation of the world. Religions hold some social answers based on observation of society, mixed with superstitious elements like gods to make people join.

Answer 5

It is sad that ppl want to separate religion and science.

To me it's like trying to unscramble eggs, only to re-scramble them later.

Answer 6

then blind faith it shall be
Faith in God has far more riches and rewards than proof from science.
Just that science doesn't want to prove God's existence.

Answer 7

It's not true. Religion is inherently blind, as it is based upon delusion. Science gets along just fine without religion.