English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

No, because the garden of eden is fiction. Dodos lived at the same time as human beings, but dinosaurs did not.

2007-01-02 09:33:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

This is from an Early Church Father,

Early 2nd Century Church Father Origen state: “What man of sense will agree with the statement that the first, second and third days in which the evening is named and the morning, were without sun, moon and stars, and the first day without a heaven. What man is found such an idiot as to suppose that God planted trees in paradise in Eden, like a husbandman, and planted therein the tree of life, perceptible to the eyes and senses, which gave life to the eater thereof; and another tree which gave to the eater thereof a knowledge of good and evil? I believe that every man must hold these things for images, under which the hidden sense lies concealed” (Origen - Huet., Prigeniana, 167 Franck, p. 142).

Ya only a fool would think it literal.

2007-01-02 17:41:19 · answer #2 · answered by Automaton 5 · 0 0

Yes, but the dinosaurs were too big to fit on the ark so rather than build the ark big enough to accomadate them, Noah took the easy way out and let them drown. As for DoDo birds, Noah invited them onboard but they were too stupid to accept.

2007-01-02 17:33:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Probably not. You're confusing the Garden with the Ark. The Garden didn't have two of everything, just the pretty stuff.

2007-01-02 17:37:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If the garden of eden existed, then there's still a 1% chance that they were all centralized right there.

It's all about evolution.

2007-01-02 17:34:31 · answer #5 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 0 0

Nope. Domestic animals or farm animals of the field.

Gen 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.

2007-01-02 17:34:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The essential difference between man and animal lies solely within. An animal can only return to animistic substantiality (Animal plan) alter casting aside its physical body, whereas man returns to spiritual substantiality, which is far higher.

2007-01-02 19:44:52 · answer #7 · answered by wellcome 3 · 0 0

Yes. And unicorns and mermaids. At least according to the tracts the Jehova's Witnesses leave on my doorstep.

2007-01-02 17:34:40 · answer #8 · answered by True Dat 4 · 0 0

... then why do dinosaurs fossils have little dinosaurs in their bellies... and not dogs, cats and humans?

here's a dodo bird
http://www.birds.mu/Extinct/Images/Dodo1.jpg

2007-01-02 17:34:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dont think dinosaurs were and im not familiar with the bird youre mentioning so maybe...its long ago...we should be more concerned with our futures!

2007-01-02 17:33:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers