I do not need a complete knowledge of the universe to prove to you that cubic spheres do not exist. Such objects have mutually-exclusive attributes which would render their existence impossible. For example, a cube, by definition, has 8 corners, while a sphere has none. These properties are completely incompatible: they cannot be held simultaneously by the same object. It is my intent to show that the supposed properties of the Christian God Yahweh, like those of a cubic sphere, are incompatible, and by so doing, to show Yahweh's existence to be an impossibility.
2007-01-02 09:31:16 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Have you ever heard of plastic or ancient glass blowing. If you are smart as you think, you know what I am referring to.
What is the area of a straight line? If you are smart or not you must realize that a drawing of a sphere or cube is neither sphere or cube it is only a drawing of such.
Even if you hold in your hand such a plastic or glass sphere or cube you would not know from whence it came or for what to do with it unless you had abstract reasoning.
To your dog, you can do what is impossible.
You can open a door, your dog cannot.
You can open a can of dog food, your dog cannot.
We know not what is compatible, we only know what is not compatible at our stage of evolution, and technology.
2007-01-02 09:45:16 · answer #1 · answered by MrsOcultyThomas 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh, so you're the one person out of all history who's going to prove the non-existence of God? All those brilliant thinkers from the past who couldn't do it...but YOU'RE the one who will?
Give it up. Believe, don't believe--your call. But proving the existence of God one way or the other is impossible. Many have tried, all have failed.
2007-01-02 17:33:50 · answer #2 · answered by SlowClap 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think all images of god are easily proven to be untrue. But when we get to the concept of the something that has always been -- the thing (whatever it is) that resulted in the universe (even if this thing is the potential of a universe), we're left with no concepts because concepts only exist in a dualistic universe.
2007-01-02 17:36:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
On the other hand, can you take the specifics of gravity, DNA, a living cell, love, the universe and all it's wonders and say that this is not proof of a Supreme God? Even the scientists have to admit the odds of a living cell forming from nothing intelligent are impossible.
2007-01-02 17:36:59 · answer #4 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
A cubic sphere could exist by being a solid shell shaped as a sphere on the outer layer and a cube on the inner layer.
2007-01-02 17:35:39 · answer #5 · answered by Night Shade 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Math,now isn't that a new one ? Go figure , I guess they couldn't scientifically prove God wrong so now they will try a mathematical approach.What next ?
2007-01-03 02:22:59 · answer #6 · answered by don_steele54 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting analogy.
2007-01-02 17:50:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.God exists, you can check on line. You will see Him as He wiggles His noodley appendages for our delight .
Ramen !
2007-01-02 17:52:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if could prove there was a god would you need faith.
would you not kill god in process?
2007-01-02 17:38:10 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Divinity can have properties that are senseless to human logic--else, it is not divine!
2007-01-02 17:35:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋