How can an intelligent person compare gay marriage and child abuse?

Question

When a gay couple gets married is a child being abused?

When a gay couple gets married is a talking donkey involved?

Only the most ignorant of the already ignorant would ever compare child abuse, pedophelia, or bestiality to sexual orientation!

Answer 1

Well, you see, that's just the thing. They aren't intelligent :p

Answer 2

Oh noes! ladies getting pregnant early from all that gay intercourse... ok, extreme(ish)ly working jointly gay marriage with little ones being raised in a same intercourse companion and youngsters is incorrect and lazy. Quoting documents touching on daughters getting pregnant early interior the absence of their organic and organic father is pointless except you're additionally attempting to cut back/make unlawful: single determine families, families with a stepfather, fostering/adoption and youngsters being raised in care properties. _____ so some distance as i will see, the declare you're touching on isn't interior the precis of that article and that i do no longer want to register (or re-register) with JSTOR to look at it. Assuming it somewhat is as you place it however, quite a few ideas happen: a million. So what? gay behaviour isn't a bad element in and of itself. it ought to be a bad element if eg a right now infant spent years chasing the incorrect tails because it have been, yet this is a huge bounce from what you wrote. It does no longer be any worse than gay little ones being forced to locate right now relationships, and all of us understand that occurs aplenty. 2. whilst no gay gene has been discovered as such, it somewhat is in many situations known among experts interior the sphere that homosexuality has a genetic factor. is this compensated for interior the study? 3. families with gay mom and dad in are no longer at risk of be homophobic. In some right now families, gay little ones will experience stress to fake to be right now. yet another confounding variable. ______ "25%" "0%" i do no longer understand what to make of those documents. How huge grew to become into the pattern length, with the aid of fact 0% is somewhat extraordinary. 4 of each and every team possibly? I surely have an intensive pal who's continuously prevalent she is a lesbian and her mom surely hasn't had gay relationships, (being a Jehovah's Witness) so the only occasion i understand for confident contrasts sharply with the 0%. i do no longer think of her lady pal's mom swings that way in any respect the two...

Answer 3

Oh, I know. It really is awful, isn't it!

I think the argument they try to make is that something can be "wrong" even if it doesn't affect your life in a negative way.

But I mean, come on! Nobody is arguing for the legitimacy of bestiality. And in child abuse there is objective harm going on. It's really just ridiculous.

Answer 4

I agree that Gay marriage has nothing to do with Child Abuse ECT.

But many uninformed people, or actually they are more likely misinformed - Are scared of the unknown

They consider " Gayism " As horrible as a pervert, or child molester, and to be Gay is perverted, -

This is their connection.

And unfortunately its still exists as does, Raceism, and sexism.
Among other things.

Lets just pray for tolerance .

Meg

Here is what the Bahai Faith teaches :

As for the responsibility of Assemblies and of individual Bahá'ís, certainly all are called upon to be understanding, supportive and helpful to any individual who carries the burden of homosexuality (Extract 13)."

(The Universal House of Justice, 1993 Jun 05, Homosexuality, p. 2)

The Universal House of Justice understands the concern you feel upon discovering that the Faith includes teachings about homosexuality which differ so markedly from your own views. This discovery may best be regarded not as a challenge to your faith in Bahá'u'lláh but rather as an opportunity for you to acquire a deeper understanding of the Baha i teachings and their implications.

(The Universal House of Justice, 1993 Jun 05, Homosexuality, p. 7)

Answer 5

An "intelligent" person would never compare the two. One is love between two consenting adults of the same sex. The other is the abuse of a child who cannot give consent. Gay marriage is love, child abuse is a crime.

Answer 6

I see that the two not so intelligent people who used a talking donkey and child abuse as comparisons don't have the guts to post here.

Answer 7

That's how they set up their 'slippery slope' argument. Without it, the only reason to oppose gay marriage is that it's condemned in some obscure section of the Old Testament, along with eating shellfish.

Here's another slippery slope argument. If you allow adult men and women to have sex, why not allow sex with children? It's just a slippery slope, from adults having sex with other adults to adults having sex with children. So in order to prevent child abuse, we should ban all heterosexual intercourse. Because we are too stupid to recognize the difference between two things that are totally unrelated, and therefore should ban everything.

Answer 8

This is why we have standardized logic. Unfortunately, with the internet, there's no objective board that can show that a person's logic is completely flawed. We know that if someone passed in a paper with that 'logic' in school, any good teacher would give it an F (and the person would then think that the teacher was a liberal or whatever).

Answer 9

How about when a god fearing, church going, toothless male and female couple get married before god in a little church out in Ozarks and they have 8 or 9 kids who they whip whenever they commit a sin like not getting Ma her smokes and jug of moonshine fast enough ...

But they are hetrosexual !!!!

Is that child abuse ???

Answer 10

Are you fishing for tips? An intelligent person cannot do what you ask. That's like asking a stupid person to calculate the distance from their bedroom window to the sun "Hmm, it looks like about 8 inches!"