It wouldn't change me at all. I am Christian but I also believe evolution is fact, too much scientific evidence to support it. To me the origins of man, creation of the world are not important to me religiously. I believe in Jesus and try to follow his teachings because I believe they make me a better human being. Even if there is no God and when I die that is it, I still would like to be remembered as a loving caring person who would help anyone who asked. If there is a heaven than when I am there I will know how the earth was created and how man was created and evolved.
2007-01-02 06:58:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by crazyhorse19682003 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It'll never happen. Not that the Theory of Natural Selection won't be proven beyond all reasonable doubt, because it already has. But there will never, ever be adequate proof for the fundies who now insist that Evolution is 'just a theory'. Because it will never be anything but a theory; in science, a theory is a good as it gets.
Like the Theory of Electromagnetism. If you can refuse to accept Evolution as the cause for all the genetic similarities between species (like humans and other primates) then you can refuse to believe that magnetism is the force which causes two magnets to stick together. There is simply no way to force such people to open their minds, no matter how much evidence you throw at them.
If you traveled back in time and took pictures of our anthropoid ancestors, one image per century for a million years; and created a slide show like those movies of plants growing; the fundies would STILL say "it's just a theory".
2007-01-02 07:09:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by abram.kelly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Egad...you do not comprehend the 1st difficulty approximately evolution, physics, biology, or chemistry do you? there is not a team of folk mentioned as "evolutionists" the kind you have creationists. it is not something extra specific than the multiplication table. Evolution basically covers the era AFTER existence began in the worldwide. It lines the form of existence kinds, not their formation. that would desire to fall below abiogenesis, yet another subject rely totally. enable's take it from the ideal...evolution and abiogenesis do not conceal the formation of the universe. No, chemical components weren't around perpetually. The info you listed above has been basic for approximately 20-30 years, as a results of fact the time of Edwin Hubble. What we've got here across recently is that the form of actuality won't additionally be consistent. do not bounce so immediately to "supernatural." "If we won't clarify it, it may well be supernatural!" nicely are you able to describe how a reveal reveal works? If not, it may well be supernatural! there is this form of difficulty as not understanding...yet. and on occasion you may want to be high-quality with that. sure there are a number of of of failed dials. Mars, Venus, Mercury, and each planet to boot earth. sufficient debunking. Time for some solutions. huge bang began off the universe with severe enlargement. preliminary potential density meant atoms could not even condense. think of of steam. After some billion, stars began to form. all of us comprehend this as a results of fact easy travels slowly sufficient for a number of those activities to easily attain us now. After few extra billion, planet earth formed. Water everywhere, dirt, land, and so on. Ahh too lots to place in writing and too drained. Google it.
2016-10-19 09:06:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
to begin with there is no theory that suggests we evolved from apes or even ape like creatures. The guess calledevolution figures back somewhere we had a common ancestor.
If i get to back in time I will way more preoccupied with other things like stopping by to have achat with my friend Jesus. Evolution is a blip on the thought process where as teaching it as fact is a big mistake as sometime soon when geneticist complete some of their current projects you will find out.
There might have been evolution sometime somewhere but verticle evolution did not happen here silly person.
2007-01-02 06:57:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ronnysox60 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wouldn't bother me as I already believe in Evolution. But the ape ancestor thing is unsettling--modern apes and man developed from a common ancestor who was not necessarily an ape.
2007-01-02 06:54:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sick Puppy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution is nothing more than a THEORY, created by the devil to lead people away from God. There is no scientist that can prove God wrong. He is the final authority over all things created; even the scientists.
2007-01-02 07:18:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Freedom 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have never cared in the least about when and how God made his creation.personnally I believe in the Spirit of God. which is a force which directs the life force. it permeates all creation with its energy.It works thru nature to create all things alive.I do not believe all those story's made up by the Jews over the millenniums.I do however totally believe everything Jesus said. and I desire to emulate him in his teachings and within the Spirit of God I am one with all creation and the spirit and wish to be close to God and do his will.and pass on to heaven when I die by the grace of God and thru his Spirit be lead to heaven to be with my people and to continue to do his will forever.Amen and Amen.& Praise God.
2007-01-02 07:02:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well taking into consideration that Darwin got saved before he died and that you can go to www.creationscience,org for proof of creation that are not found in text books because scientist do not want you to see the otherside of the story, no that would not change my mind.
2007-01-02 06:55:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
not at all. I already believe in evolution and use it to real world situations. Evolution is great!
2007-01-02 06:53:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ghost Wolf 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You use hypothetical words. 'What if', 'pretend', etc. This isn't real you can't do this anyway. So no because your question is not logical, and according to you, from what you implied, evolution is logical, but your question that tries to prove it is illogical.
2007-01-02 06:57:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋