Yeah, well, now he's getting his fudge packed by hitler, in hell.
Hahahaha.
Scumbag.
2007-01-02 00:26:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
It amazes me that some of the answers here state that he was evil and had to die.
This may be true but it was the United States (George Bush Senior actually) that turned a blind eye after the Gulf War where he gassed the Kurds. Why did they wait 10 years later to punish him?
Also, during the Iraq -Iran War, it was the United States that were backing him even though he was gassing the Iranians as well. Where was the outrage then? It only surfaced when the United States' creation turned his back on them and began to think his country was actually a world power.
Getting back to the question though: Why was he hung? Dead men can't tell the whole story. Also, he was not a great man but a puppet of many countries. And like a puppet, he had his strings cut when his usefulness had cease to exist.
He may have gotten what he deserved. But the bottom line is that he is not the only one that should face the end of that rope. There is more than enough blame to go around in this case. We should only hope that the true story will come out one day in regards to the story of Saddam. Perhaps then, we can truly say we have all the facts.
2007-01-02 01:17:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Randy P 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
He was hung because he deserved it, he was an evil dictator with no regard for his fellow humans, if they got in his way, or he just plain didn't like him they were killed, personally i think he should have been hung on new years day to get the new year off to a good start, question is what is your state of mind if you can even think that a despot like Saddam was a great man, people like you and Saddam make me feel ashamed to be a human being
2007-01-02 03:14:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is Cherelle a c.ock or what? I don't know why Saddam was hung... oh yes, he gassed a few 1000 kurds. I guess that was the primary reason.
He used to be a man of great inspiration once before the power and money went to his head. Iraq used to be a thriving country, and a tolerant one and at one point, brought great hope to the Middle East. At what point did it all go wrong? Not sure .
2007-01-02 01:21:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by This is not ellie29uk 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because we won the war. Because the winners get to write the rules. Because we havent caught Bin Laden yet. We killed him because he was readily available, not because he had anything to do with 9-11. He represented the losing side.
We are fighting against the spread of muslim extremeism, not to save or free the Middle East. We don't really beleive democracy will flourish in the Middle East. (It can't, its ideologically oppossed to the muslim religion). We don't want that extreme ideology to spread across the Middle East into otherwise currently stable countries. like UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt etc.
The goal is to try to keep a fairly stable lid on the sh1t in the Mid East in order to stabilize the production and flow of oil to the Western world. Because the entire world requires oil, not just the US. And without a stabile oil supply to the weastern world, the world's economies will collapse, even more wars are likely, and many more thousands if not millions of people world wide run the risk of death by starvation, lack of heating fuels, resources, medicines, etc. NOT JUST IN THE US.
But since we are one of the few countries in the world with the BALLS and the MEANS, we have the responsibility to lead the war effort. Britian and Canada, and Australia have the BALLS but not the MEANS to carry the fight to the raghead. Germany and Japan have the MEANS but not the BALLS.
IF you think the US is hard on the poor downtrodden, suffering muslems DON'T piss off the Isrealis or the Chinese. Because history tells us, they will scorch the earth if either of them get turned loose. Be glad we can keep them on a leash.
Its more than because it costs too fvcking much to fill up my Caddie Escolade dumb@ss. Any leader with oil in their country should beware pissing off the world and it's global demand for oil.
Maybe it sucks to piss off the only Superpower in the world. Once one of you "developing countries" knock us off the Big Dog gold medal stand YOU can run the world YOUR way. Until then .....
2007-01-02 01:10:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by warhorse 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
troll
v.,n. 1. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] Toutter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictableresponses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase"trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream"trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through alikely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a postthat induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves lookeven more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying tothe more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberatetroll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. Seealso YHBT. 2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1;regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to anewsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than toannoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable bythe fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topicat hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the uglycreatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeemingcharacteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form oflife on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." 3.[Berkeley] Computer lab monitor. A popular campus job for CSstudents. Duties include helping newbies and ensuring that labpolicies are followed. Probably so-called because it involveslurking in dark cavelike corners.
2007-01-02 00:25:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Vinni and beer 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Apparently you haven't heard what he did. Think about it would you do all that stuff and blow yourself up for the fun of it. Not me or anyone sane enough. Who really cares now anyway he's gone theres nothing you can do and not many people want him back.
My husband is in the military and is leaving in a few months and maybe we'll have this war thing under control say...... within the next century.
2007-01-02 12:17:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by TINA R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cherelle your answer is wrong he did not fly planes into you buildings that was the other nutter with the nappy (that’s a diaper to you yanks) on his head. That’s the war in Afghanistan.
this is wrong: he flew some planes into our buildings so he had to die.
Anyone else want to mess with the USA?
The answer to the question that this was about why was he hung he was a lunatic. Who committed mass murder on his own people? Spent millions on himself nothing on his people? He deserved to die hanging was to good for him, he should have been attached lime by limb to some horses and pulled a part or some other form of torture like he inflicted on thousands of people
2007-01-02 00:47:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Clem 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
cherelle, saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 and while he was in control there was no taleban in iraq, he hated them.
zaki, what was great about him? Yes, he was a man, but how could he be so great with that amount of blood on his hands, you speak of him as though he were an innocent. That he never was. His hero was Stalin and he modelled himself on him. As for standing up to America, that's only partly true, he had an ambiguous relationship with the west, but he actually never hated them till the end.
2007-01-02 00:37:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
He may have been a great man, but he used his powers for evil things, like murder, rape and dictatorship. He is in many ways like Hitler. If they would have used there gifts for good then this world wouldn't have gone through so much. But if we wouldn't have gone through so much we wouldn't be as advanced as we are. I am not saying that I liked Saddam or Hitler, I am saying that they chose a path of evil, where if they would have chosen good they would be hero's. but as it sit now they are not.
2007-01-02 00:51:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jason R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was not an inspiration. Did lots of nasty things and i would like to see bush and blair go down for this as well.
Oh and also quite alot of other sneaky money grabbing rats (that Dick Chaney and larry silverstien to name a couple)
2007-01-02 19:04:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by roujinz3 4
·
0⤊
0⤋