English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If we are a soul and that soul is energy than it cannot be created nor destroyed.

2007-01-01 23:38:05 · 16 answers · asked by NONAME 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Nicholas, you're a soul... It is the body you leave behind.

2007-01-01 23:42:30 · update #1

16 answers

Since when was our "soul" proven to be "energy"? The last time I checked no one had been able to prove that we even have souls.

2007-01-01 23:40:25 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

I see a connection between gravity, light; magnetism; and electricity in the physical realm of our collective consciousness, or at least how most perceive this existence to be. In the meta physical properties I can only conjecture as I can not irrefutably prove my thoughts on that regard. I do not understand why a "Soul" would have to be bound by the laws of physics ( the E=MC2 part of the question ) as mortals interpret them, to my way of thinking this would almost certainly not be the case once the "Soul" was outside this physical realm and engaged as sentient in the Spiritual or again meta physical realm. Death allows matter to transfer into another form through decay, all things of the physical realm experience this process albeit at different rates as mortals now measure time ( which the existence of is questionable as well ), although death doesn't prove or disprove the existence of a "Soul" or any transference into another realm. To return to this realm once escaping it's grasp if a "Soul" were sentient seems fanciful if one were to consider what is offered to a knowing individual about how things are in the daily existent of Mankind on this harsh realm planet. The only way this all works, and for that matter ( Har Har, no pun intended!!! ) anything else is faith. We as Humans can get behind anything to make it all make sense, even when in our hearts we know it's just plain impossible. I guess that's why I party, it fills the time between now and oblivion!!!! Happy New Year, I sure would like it if You were right!

2007-01-02 00:09:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Relativity has nothing to do with matter being created or destroyed. That's the theory of conservation of matter. Anyways even if the energy of your soul can't be destroyed that doesn't mean the energy can't be dispersed and/or organized in a new way. So, even if the energy exist forever that doesn't mean your soul will.

2007-01-01 23:45:15 · answer #3 · answered by bobbert 2 · 0 0

I can see your point, I have a similar belief. I think that our souls are energy that when we die goes where ever it wants to go, but mostly we pool back into a big ball of energy where everyone is stored. That it is from this pool that new energy is drawn upon by new life to place the soul into a baby, thus that is reincarnation. But I don't feel you have to do this, I feel your energy is free to do whatever it wants or go where ever you want as long as you are conscious to this.

2007-01-01 23:46:09 · answer #4 · answered by gypsyiiiis 4 · 0 0

Even if a soul is energy (whih it's not), the theory says that energy cannot be created or destroyed but it can be converted into matter.

So even if a soul existed, it would not just hang around after a person dies

2007-01-01 23:44:08 · answer #5 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 0 0

a million. The rules of physics stay the a similar for all observers in all frames regardlesss of their relative action. 2. the cost of sunshine(in a vacuum) is invarient for all observers regardless of their relative moton. the cost of sunshine is desperate via 2 oftentimes happening constants : permeability and permitivity. those 2 constants are additionally what make certain the strengths of the magnetic and electrostatic fields. for this reason to verify that the cost of sunshine to have different values relative to an observer as measured via that observer, those constants are consistent in all frames. (a minimum of it became believed to be authentic via Eienstien and cotempraries). as a result, simultanity is got here across to stand at distance between frames. i'm sorry yet this may well be a mathematical attitude on your question. enable us to assume that the area between the two frmaes does rely. the area between the fram will settle for as a linear consistent '@'. (it is not a variable as a results of fact for each non homogenous equipment of equation there is basically one unique answer.) For length contraction: Please evaluate the Lorentz ingredient. L == a million/(a million-(u^2/c^2))^a million/2); If we've been to characteristic a '@' and integarte to locate its impact we'd finally end up with a similar ingredient. as a results of fact the integrating ingredient cancels '@' out. in case you extremely need to remedy for the integrating ingredient. I.F = e^(fundamental((u^2/c^2))^a million/2)) wrt u.

2016-10-19 08:43:36 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The sun is also a source of energy, & God created the Sun Gen.1:16, As far as do I see the connections, there is no connections to see, There is no reincarnation, But a resurrection.

2007-01-01 23:48:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, and if you had a bit more information about relativity you would not imagine a connection either. It is easy to jump to an improper conclusion by making false analogies to subjects we are unfamiliar with.

2007-01-01 23:51:48 · answer #8 · answered by Barabas 5 · 0 0

> If we are a soul

Assertion with no evidence.

> and that soul is energy

Assertion with no evidence.

Nice try. Play again soon.

2007-01-01 23:44:38 · answer #9 · answered by gebobs 6 · 0 0

think outside of the box....

The laws of thermodynamics do not apply to the Creator who made the Laws.


But you are correct... your soul will never die.

You can either live with Christ as your savior in heaven

or you can reject him and spend eternity in hell

2007-01-01 23:42:36 · answer #10 · answered by I_Need_Help 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers