Born-Again Christians are like persistent irritating musquitoes - who will not buzz off. Rather than die a slow death at the ramblings of a Born-Again , I would rather take my chances with the muslim terrorist.
2007-01-01 19:38:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Silver Bullet 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well the muslim terrorist has the gun in your example so clearly that would be more of a problem. If they both could have the gun then I would say both are as worrying as the other.
I dont think a 'muslim terrorist' is going to shoot me for anything anyway, the same as the christian wouldnt.
But I wouldnt get into a debate about the religion with either one of them. untill I knew if they were safe or not.
2007-01-01 19:16:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
As a Muslim Terrorist, I find this question offensive. You emphasis the "born again" part of the Christian but no emphasis whatsoever on my gun. What will the Christian do to you, except attempt (to the best of their ability) to show you to Christ. I have a gun! You better fear me!
2007-01-01 19:14:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by firerookie 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Since I am born again, I would prefer to be stuck with a Muslim terrorist. That way I could convert him to make him born again also or he could kill me and send me to heaven.
2007-01-01 19:13:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Future Citizen of Forvik 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
it truly is a very huge question. Atheism actually potential 'without god' and considering maximum human acts of devastation were contained in the call of one god or yet another, this may recommend that they're a lot less risky than those with a faith. in case you imagine about it in a extra precis way, atheism promotes loose wondering and the alternative to have self assurance what you want without the seize 22 situation of someone telling you what's real with none info. in this way, many faiths easily promote lack of expertise over understanding. (The reasoning behind this lays with early society people attempting to form a attainable society that applications nicely mutually. faith is a very effective thanks to attempt this, consequently why there are diverse similarities between them). So in accordance to what you recommend by damage, in early human society atheism might want to were extra adverse to the progression of the human race yet in cutting-edge cases (the merely good one hundred and fifty years or so) faith is dropping its position in present day society.
2016-12-01 10:26:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well... Muslim terrorists ARE terrorists... there are many born again Christians who dont want to hurt anyone. Im one of them. Being born again doesnt make you hurt people, being a terrorist does by default.
2007-01-01 19:09:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by impossble_dream 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Muslim Terrorists are physically, more dangerous, as they seem to like explosive devices and have no fear of their own death.
That and the underlying religion are the only real differences between the two groups.
2007-01-01 19:13:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Daniel E 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
The terrorist has no reason to harm me, as terrorism, by definition, has the purpose of envoking terror... If no one is around to see it, then a terrorist won't bother you... So I'd chose the terrorist, at least I'd only have limited understanding of the language of any religious rhetoric.
2007-01-01 19:15:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by yelxeH 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'd prefer the peaceful one with a Bible. Guns scare me.
Christianity does not bore you. Otherwise you wouldn't be on this site in this category.
2007-01-01 19:13:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would prefer the Muslim. The Christian encroach upon my way of life every day. or at least tries.
2007-01-01 19:12:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋