None of that is even remotely logical.
I'm not going to argue with the stuff you're saying about the universe, because I don't want you to get the idea that it would matter if it were true.
Basically, I don't accept the way you're claiming God proved his word because it's vague, illogical and could be applied to virtually any imaginary or mythological figure.
2007-01-01 11:52:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Humans wrote the bible. They claim that the bible is the "truth" but it was written by humans 2,000 years ago who had very limited knowledge of the world around them. They used their imagination to fill in the gaps, and god was used as the gap filler. The bible and religion is incapable of evolving, it is forever stuck in the past. Therefore it is not the word of god, but the word of ancient humans.
What if the universe has always been around, meaning it's infintily old. If something has always been around, it was never created. So where does god fit into the picture? Humans place god in the picture because most of us humanize things to better understand them. But why should the universe conform to human beliefs and wishes?
2007-01-01 12:18:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the same reason that you cannot accept the Qur'an, the Vedas, the Zend-Avesta, etc. Barnes and Noble is filled with books; what proof is there that the Bible is the word of God?
BTW, the Church tried to use the Bible to prove the Sun and the planets went around the Earth.
2007-01-01 12:35:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Doctor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some thing have two parts. Some things have four or more parts. Does that prove there is no god?
The universe began 13.7 billion years ago. Does that prove there is no god, if it had a beginning?
The frictionless thing is just stupid. That doesn't make sense at all.
The planet thing also doesn't make sense - and planets and some orbit a common center of mass, so technically they both orbit that, and not each other.
OK, got any more, since these were so easy to shoot down?
2007-01-01 11:54:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by eri 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
OK, fellow answerer's, take some time to read through his previous questions. You can see that he's not posting these questions just to get a straight answer: he is trying to force his opinions on other people. If you were any sort of man, you would just let this be. People are going to be different from you, people are going to have different beliefs and values from you (religious or not), and that's what makes everyone unique in this world, and there is nothing you can do, not even your negative rants on here, to change that. I suggest you find some patience and acceptance within yourself...if not, keep your mouth shut if you don't have anything positive to say.
2007-01-01 12:05:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There were four kids in the narnia movie, and the compass has four directions. That proves the movie really happened.
Applying your "logic", of course.
And it's a shame that god didn't tell anybody about the heliocentricity thing, the church could have avoided a lot of trouble that way.
Come on, Maurice is an atheist trying to make christians look retarded. It's completely obvious.
2007-01-01 11:59:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by eldad9 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see lots of things in the Bible that are contradictory and scientifically proven wrong so I KNOW it isn't a divinely inspired book.
I hate copy and paste but it is the only way I can give you an example
First Account (Genesis 1:1-2:3)
Second Account (Genesis 2:4-25)
Genesis 1:25-27
(Humans were created after the other animals.)
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let us make man in our image.... So God created man in his own image.
Genesis 2:18-19
(Humans were created before the other animals.)
And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
Genesis 1:27
(The first man and woman were created simultaneously.)
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Genesis 2:18-22
(The man was created first, then the animals, then the woman from the man's rib.)
And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them.... And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
2007-01-01 11:55:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Alex 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible is a farce used to control the masses by using scare tactics. I am a Christian but no dusty old book full of rules will tell me how to live and commune with my God. List out the dogma and rules to live by in the Bible and then tell me who could be so perfect as to never break any of them. Even a stray thought is a sin.
2007-01-01 11:53:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Russ J 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
<>
And lots of things in nature have two parts, not three. Two sexes, symmetry in biomorphism, two strands of DNA in a double helix, etc.
Doesn't that instead prove the dual nature of the Divine, as represented by the God and Goddess?
(Do you now understand how ludicrous your examples are?)
2007-01-01 12:13:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You've answered your own question and you're not intelligent enough to recognize it.
Here's a hint; "that the Bible can be proven;but not with scientific means"
If it can't be proven by scientific means, then it cannot be proven. There is NO other method of obtaining proof than by the scientific method. Anyone who says otherwise is an outright moron.
2007-01-01 11:54:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋