I am just 17, but coming from a broken home, I have learned the right way of treating a woman. I have a girlfriend at this time and I do what I can to help her in any way possible. She had a bad accident in her car and while it was in the shop, I let her use mine becuase I have a motorcycle that I normally ride anyway. She had a big phone bill by texting a bit too much and I gave her the money from my savings account. She really wanted to see her friend that lives in Montreal and I took her to Montreal out of my own time. I just try to be the best I can be.
2007-01-01 10:12:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Josh W 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Honey, You sound JUST like a helpless female. If you need a man to satisfy your emotional needs ie) insecurities you are not much of a woman.
Men have their own agenda and unlike most women have been taught that they must in order to survive, physically, financially and emotionally. You need to find your own agenda as well. Get a hobby, some female friends and focus on something other than a penis.
If you choose to fall into the love trap at least when it doesn't work out (and it won't, have you seen the divorce statistics?) you won't be behaving like the needy child you are now.
Women's liberation has nothing to do with men being emotionally kind to women. It is based in being treated equally in employment and legal areas. Anyone who would object to anyone being liberated (free) has deeper issues than I can go into here.
Big ups to you too Rio
2007-01-01 10:07:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Are you angry because men don't consider highly sexually active women good for marriage (in the traditional sense)? Well, can you blame them? It's basic logic. If she gives away sex easily, they will give sex away easily in the future. People don't change overnight just because they exchanged rings or signed a contract. So if they are expecting a monogamous marriage, that woman, or man if it's a man, is not good marriage material. But someone like me, who doesn't expect monogamy anyway, and would sleep around a lot while encouraging her to sleep around too, would not mind.
2016-05-23 04:00:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in it, but only to the point of being reasonable about it. I wouldn't be putting 100% effort, 100% of the time in a relationship because I'd be exhausted in everything else. Mabey not, but I just don't think that's fair, mabey if she'd be the one to take control some days and on others I would to.
2007-01-01 09:42:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd imagine there are, somewhere. But I don't want a man who is chivalrous in any aspect. I demand complete equality. If I wanted to be pampered, I'd go to a day spa. In the world of Rio, chivalry is dead, and my feminist friends and I regularly eat pancakes on its grave. (By the way, Lacalledelapicara — you rock.)
2007-01-01 13:31:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
It exists. Some men try their best to do that. There are not alot of men out there that do that. Especially single. Consider that they are single for a reason. But there are good guys out there. I'm like that as much as I can.
2007-01-01 10:08:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dido 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There aren't many of us left....Woman's lib took care of that
2007-01-01 09:43:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by oohJOHNNY 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
i think so.
yeah, many expect you to take care of them.
but i am hopeful.
2007-01-01 09:57:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it's not dead...I do it every day. However, it does not appear to be appreciated.
2007-01-01 09:42:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by PK 2
·
1⤊
0⤋