'Hate-speak' at school draws scrutiny(kids forced to listen to pro-immigration speeches)Good for her for coming forward to report this! Is this the midset of pro legal ?
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/daily/local/9256.php
Americans better start waking up and doing something about the madness that's occurring in our nation's high schools and elementary schools. Youngsters are being subjected to left-wing propaganda, and when teachers and principals are caught, they start two-stepping around the issue. For instance, a Tucson high school student is scheduled to appear before Arizona lawmakers to tell how she was forced by school officials to listen to a pro-immigrant speech by a speaker spewing left-wing propaganda to students without rebuttal. In addition, lawmakers are investigating why Tucson school buses were used to provide transportation for student protesters at a pro-illegal
2007-01-01 09:06:27 · 18 answers · asked by MinuteWoman 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Why wouldn't they allow any one to offer an their point of view ?
2007-01-01 09:15:13 · update #1
Your kids cant pray in school, but they can listen to a Latina activists,hate speech..Interesting isn't it.Why not next week have an Islam extremists tell the kids the rewards of being a suicide bomber. That's a learning process too isn't it? Were the
Minute Men allowed to tell their "take" on illegal aliens and the "hated Democrats" ? Time to shadow your kids.Go to thei classes,sit in on assembles like this.Read their text books and listen to their teachers.After all its your kids and your tax money ISN'T it ?
MARCH FOR AMERICA
http://www.lframerica.com/march2.html...
2007-01-01 09:33:39 · answer #1 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 8⤊ 2⤋
this is a unfastened usa. Freedom of speech is aside of being unfastened. i'm no longer asserting that dislike speech is good yet you won't be able to tell somebody that they are able to assert regardless of yet say as long because it is not offensive. i do no longer bear in concepts words ever killing all and sundry. Sticks and stones could smash my bones yet words will in no way harm me. you could say I hate pink and somebody is indignant. the issue isn't the speech, the issue is everybody is too gentle you incredibly won't be able to assert something without hurting a individual's thoughts.
2016-10-06 07:25:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We get the "anti-White" propaganda from all sides. At my school, we have a Black principal, who also happens to be a secretary for the local chapter of the NAACP. She has been pushing the "anti-White" institutional racism agenda. This particular chapter has made a precedence of going to schools and calling staff racists when Blacks don't get their way. But that is how the NAACP works it.
2007-01-01 10:31:47 · answer #3 · answered by Dawes 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Students should be able to hear and debate both sides of an issue--that's what learning is all about, not promoting either a liberal or a conservative agenda. School should not be a political forum for either side.
2007-01-01 17:01:26 · answer #4 · answered by mizchulita 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You all must remember that liberalism and racial/cultural mixing is the FORCED LEARNING at school institutions as the MORAL HIGH HORSE.
The schools have to teach pro-immigration, pro gay, basically anything that is anti-western, or anti-white. Its a shame really.
Do something about it! Smash the liberals!
2007-01-01 10:30:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hate speech should not be allowed. THAT speech, however, is not hateful. It's a call to understanding, tolerance and an appeal to our common humanity.
What is hateful, and perverse, is any interpretation of that, that could charactorise such a speech as anything but that.
13 million illegal immigrants are embedded in American life. They're not going anywhere, so you'd better learn to live with it.
2007-01-01 10:45:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
this all stems from a supreme court decision in 1954 which took away the rights of the local school board to decide what was taught in their schools and who could speak there. this infamous decision was called Brown vs. Board of Education and it came from Kansas.
2007-01-01 10:33:46 · answer #7 · answered by bearbait7351 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Liberals are for free speech... as long as they agree with it. If they don't they will shout you down, set off fire alarms, etc. It really is becoming ridiculous when idiots like Ward Churchill have the gall to complain about the capitalistic system when they are reaping the benefits of it. If Ward and his merry band of morons don't like it here, move to Mexico. I won't miss them.
2007-01-01 09:35:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I got nothing...sadly, it appears as if this faction is going to have their way unless someone in Washington grows a pair and stops behaving in a politically correct fashion. I use Numbers USA to let my lawmakers know my opinions on this and other issues.
2007-01-01 09:15:02 · answer #9 · answered by Rich B 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
First of all, no one is against immigration. It's illegal immigration that is destroying this country. Why would you call it left wing propaganda? When it is Bush that is in control and refuses to do anything, so his corporate friends can hire illegals at below wages and rip off the legal American citizens.
2007-01-01 09:19:31 · answer #10 · answered by jackie 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋