Iran or N. Korea or any country friendly to islamic -fascist -extremist-terrorists.
2007-01-01 10:12:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Seriously? Nobody. But if we had to, I'd say either the Sudan, or Pakistan. Sudan, because it is a breeding ground for state sanctioned terror (at least Iran keeps a leash on theirs most of the time) where Osama got his (figurative) diploma, and where we can use the genocide there as political cover for the invasion (and feel good about stopping a genocide as an added bonus). Pakistan because while they say they are helping they are actually hindering in the search for Bin Laden and AQ (and when Musharrif finally gets assasinated Islamic radicals will control nuclear weapons by the dozens).
I want to stress I don't think either of these is a realistic target from a military or political standpoint, only that they would make more sense than either Iran or North Korea.
2007-01-01 20:21:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chance20_m 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you want me to be serious I would say Iran and North Korea.Although both have the capability to put up a long and brutal fight.North Korea would have devestating results for South Korea and Japan.An invasion of Iran would look like Iraq except 100 times worser cause the terrorists would spread all over the world.
2007-01-01 18:18:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
After reading some of the replies to questions on this media, I would think that the American people need to attack the Internet.
Those of us who use this thing surely have to recognize that some of the antagonistic retorts are from non-American persons, probably from Islamic folks who are trying to help their religion conquer the world.
If I needed to, I'm sure I could find and publish many irregular, scurrilous and ridiculous actions by the leaders of every country in the world. What would I accomplish other than to show that the leaders of the world's countries are NORMAL HUMAN BEINGS with normal tendencies to make mistakes. SO WHAT?
There has to be a way to get the respondants on this media to grow up and start thinking and acting like mature people.
2007-01-01 17:55:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. Been there 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
Hi ,
According to all news coming in Italian newspapers and TV programs , a great threat is represented by Iran and Ahmadinejiad policy.
Iran is always nuclear enemy not only for US , but for Italy, Uk and European Community.
Bye.
Simon (from Milan).
2007-01-01 17:36:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Simone S 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
How about no one? Seriousily, the pentagon estimates that there are about 1,000 to 10,000 active insurgents in Iraq. Which shows one of two things, the pentagon is terribly mistaken or the US Army and Marine Corps is getting their asses kicked despite having a 10 (to 100) to one number advantage.
Before you start hawking for a new war try fighting in one first!
US Army
OIF III-IV
2007-01-01 17:53:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rich C 2
·
6⤊
2⤋
Canada. Bush wants the maple syrup all to himself. But seriously it should be North Korea. But it would be a stupid move if he wants to invade another country now with most of our troops in Iraq.
2007-01-01 17:30:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by andy 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Who are you and which country are you in?
2007-01-01 17:19:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
he said seriously..... so saudi arabi.. iran and Nkorea are on the edge of making Nucleaar war heads lets not push them over before we know, but we cant wait to long.
2007-01-01 18:11:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by james s 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Syria.
2007-01-01 19:11:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by seek_fulfill 4
·
2⤊
1⤋