How does disproving evolution prove god?

Question

You see a few questions on here along the lines of "OK evolutionists / big bangers, answer this...". I assume these are posted by religious people, trying to posit that if "we" are wrong, "they" must be right..

So my question.
How does disproving evolution / big bang prove god?

Isn't it like pointing at a house, and saying "It's not a car, so it must be an elephant"?

PLEASE don't reply either "it says so in the bible" or "You will burn in hell". Think about it for a minute.

Answer 1

It doesn't.

Then again

The fact that Evolution can't be disproved has never stopped God Botherrrs coming out with their tired, and discredited, "If we evolved from apes why are there still apes" arguments

Answer 2

There are two possibilities for the universe and life being here. One is through evolution, the other is through Creation. If you take a serious look at evolution, you see there are many flaws in the theory. The biggest problem with life is where did the information come from? If you look at the DNA code, which is the building block of life, it's in a digital code, which could only be by intelligent design. Digital codes can't evolve. The strands of the DNA code are in every cell of your body, about a trillion cells. If you were to take the strands of DNA from each of your cells, and lay them out, the strand would go from Earth past Pluto. I've asked the question before, but no one has ever said where the information for life came from.

Back to your question, if evolution didn't happen, than the only alternative is Creation. And to have Creation, you need a Creator. That Creator we call God.

Answer 3

You can't disprove evolution nor prove it. No one was there and therefore there is no documentation of anything in the distant past. By the same token, you cannot prove nor disprove God. Evolution is just as much a "faith" issue as is religion. All we do is look at evidence and each individual must decide which they are going to believe. Even if you disprove "god" you still haven't proven evolution either.

Edit: Considering this why do evolutionists say that dinosaur bones prove evolution. Al it proves is that there were animals that do not exist now. IT in no way proves that they evolved.

Answer 4

Evolution is a actuality. in case you are the non secular sort who's having issues believing in evolution, think of of it this form. the rationalization technological expertise and faith conflicts isn't as a results of fact they of course do, yet as a results of fact of our inadequate know-how of the two. there is not something interior the Holy Scriptures that say evolution isn't authentic. It basically mentioned that we've been made out of dirt and that existence became breathed into the 1st guy. Now in case you’re going to take that extremely, you have a real concern. The bible doesn’t would desire to delve into such scientific concerns as a results of fact the attitude of evolution as a results of fact it holds specifically basically information that we supposedly want for salvation. you may’t locate something interior the Bible which could instruct you laptop, are you able to? If technological expertise is the pursuit of actuality, and if the ideally suited Being is the ideal embodiment of actuality, then time will come while our expertise in technological expertise and our expertise in our faith will basically be sure one yet another.

Answer 5

The proof is in the pudding and who made pudding?
Seriously tho,
why do you need to prove anything?
if you did what would it benefit you?
You could seek until your brain falls out of your head for proof,but then,what was it all for?
I do know that we want answers that are complete in proof but then what would we do?
I believe we would sit around banging on drums and trying to figure out how that drum makes such a bang of a sound like a monkey might.
Proof is a ladder you just don't know until you reach the top- where God is.
No I cannot prove God only He can*

Answer 6

I understand you point exactly. There are a lot of people who think that the bible was meant to be interpreted literally instead as an allegory to explain the existence of the world. These are the groups that feel that the world started with two people in the garden of Eden etc. You will never get these people to understand any differently as this is how they have been indoctrinated and they are not looking to see any other view than the narrow one that they have internalized. Ironic however that many of these same people would happily kill another to prove their beliefs, and treat someone from another religion with cruelty and hate. I don't recall Jesus every advocating these behaviours.

Answer 7

You may want to try the sites:
ASK MOSES.COM
& ABOUT.COM
They answered some of these same questions I had as to how the dinosaurs & bible coinsided with eachother & it made sense to me.Too long to get into here,but check those out for starters.
And no I'm not an atheist I do believe In G-D!!!

Answer 8

I think its a little bit narrow to put those two in a truth statement to fight it out, don't you?

In other words, I don't find all of it mutually exclusive. Without the time frame, 'evolution' follows and awfully similar pattern to the way life was put on the planet according to Genesis.

Coincidence? I think not.

Answer 9

Disproving evolution doesn't prove the existence of a God in any way. And even if both were true, they can exist together. And what is interesting, even Charles Darwin believed in God.

Answer 10

It's not. There were always people who didn't believe in God. Darwin's theory is just one of many excuses for many people not to believe in God. If someone doesn't want to believe you can't make them believe by disproving evolution. Disproving evolution is just destroying one of many excuses.