It is definitely true that an intact penis is more sensitive. But that does not mean that a natural man lasts less long, just that he has a lot more pleasure doing it. There is NO advantage to genital mutilation!
2007-01-04 13:06:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Maple 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
YES, probably true.
Now some info on circumcision, keep reading...
CIRCUMCISION IS VERY BENEFICIAL, its cleaner, healthier and several prestigious research institutions have proved that circumcised men have less risk of contracting STD's such as AIDS-HIV, syphilis or herpes.
Uncircumcised penises are difficult to keep clean, and more prone to infections and penile cancer, studies have shown.
A circumcised penis is naturally clean and virtually free from urinary infections. You will not have to worry again with careful washing of your penis.
Is it NOT true that the AAP (American Academy of Paediatrics) does not recommend circumcision. They simply say they leave the decision to parents. But recently, and specially after the recent studies by the US National Institutes of Health, the AAP has been discussing if it may be necessary to change their policy and recommend circumcision to all newborns as they used to do, so in the future we may see that the AAP advocates circumcision again.
Have a look at: http://www.baby-health.net/articles/381.html
About STD's:
As I said, several studies carried out by prestigious research bodies have proved that uncircumcised penises are more prone to infections and contraction of STD's, including AIDS-HIV. It has been confirmed that circumcised men are up to 70% less likely to be infected than those who are uncircumcised. Have a look at this site: http://www.torontodailynews.com/index.php/HealthNews/2006121404Circumcision
As for women, studies also show that circumcision also protects female partners from AIDS-HIV and other STD's. Browse this article: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_08_06.html
About sensitivity of a circumcised penis:
NO medical or physiological study has ever shown that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. It is completely FALSE that circumcision reduces penis sensitivity. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm
Circumcision is an easy and nowadays *painless* procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.
Circumcision is NOT an amputation. Circumcision is NOT comparable at all to female circumcision, which is something completely different.
Circumcision rates are INCREASING nowadays, both in the United States and overseas. Many African, Asian and Latin American countries with little circumcision tradition are starting to promote the procedure to help to reduce the AIDS-HIV infection rates.
Finally, this site has a lot of useful and *unbiased* information. Make sure you have a good look: http://www.circinfo.net
2007-01-01 15:57:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Scuba 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
I seriously doubt it. My husband is not circumcised, and there are no problems with longevity. Besides, when the male organ is erect, it looks just like a circumcised organ. There's no difference.
2007-01-01 15:52:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rosebee 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
circumcision is good I think because it is hygienic...also the rim of the penis when hard is satisfying to females.
2007-01-01 15:53:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sarah GB 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
praise the lord & it's cleaner & less sensitive
2007-01-01 15:53:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by RickeTy 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
no....not true....
2007-01-01 15:52:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋