Think about it....Are we wrong not to grant him a second trial- Maybe in L.A. ( he could have hung-out with O.J. !!!)
2007-01-01 04:19:48 · 11 answers · asked by budlowsbro420 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
We did , after all , supply the weapons to him (with lots of ammo) and more - and then set him free to fight iran......(bad idea)......maybe we should have kept our nose out of the whole thing from the very start......NO WAR FOR OIL !!!!
2007-01-02 16:55:02 · update #1
Bush had no right to invade and provoke Iraq. It was done for oil and Hussein was in the way. He was, of course, guilty for crimes against his people. There are many, many leaders that are guilty for crimes against their people. Bush couldn't care less...
2007-01-01 06:43:22 · answer #1 · answered by tron 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saddam, like most dictators, take mass murder to a different level. Guilty? You might rather ask the families of the hundreds of thousands of people that he tortured and/or murdered.
2007-01-01 12:24:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do. There was only one scape-goat and that was Jesus. He lived a perfect sinless life and died to save us from our sin.
2007-01-01 13:51:22 · answer #3 · answered by AdoreHim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.........Scape-goat? For what? Yeah, I know the U.S. kinda got sidetracked with him, but think of all the families and homes and lives he's destroyed. Good riddance for the sick bastard.
2007-01-01 12:29:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was really guilty. And of much more that he was convicted of. Let the Iraqi's have their justice.
2007-01-01 12:23:26 · answer #5 · answered by Alex 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He wasn't a scapegoat, he was a guilty old goat.
2007-01-01 12:23:26 · answer #6 · answered by MeanKitty 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's funny how the united states and allies put him in power of iraq to wage war against iran. They, then, turn their backs on him when he can't do the job..
2007-01-01 12:27:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of the crime for which he was convicted and executed?
Saddam was guilty.
And the crime for which he was tried was one of his minor offenses against humanity.
2007-01-01 12:30:47 · answer #8 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam Hussein had no right to kill innocents.
2007-01-01 12:22:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
guilty
2007-01-01 12:21:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋