Last night my fiancee' was amazed at how young some of the people who she met looked for their age. They all seemed to have one thing in common: They never really overextened themselves, and had incredibly stress free lifestyles. The majority held no job or a marginal one, and still lived at home. The difference between them and "upwardly mobile" people of about the same age was too dramatic to just be co-incidence. Assuming all of your basic needs (i.e. food, shelter, healthcare) are covered, does a lifetime of low stress, menial jobs, no children ensure youth and good health?
2007-01-01 04:00:47 · 5 answers · asked by LanceMiller77 2 in Health ➔ Other - Health
I'd say yes...there's no stress or gain on the body...as long as they take care of their body later on in life.
2007-01-01 04:04:07 · answer #1 · answered by paratechfan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, babe. get your head out of the clouds, do you really want to have mommy and daddy take care of you forever??? to me that would be MORE stressful.
the key to youth and good health is good living, no smoking, little or no drinking,drugs, etc.
and yes, little or no stress. i find that having God in my life contributes to my level of contentment.
i'm a wife, and a mom, and i work, pay bills, live a NORMAL life and answer to no one, but God.
imagine these same lazy bums @50 with no $$$, no home of their own, and no kids???(the only way to insure THAT is to have no sex)
wow, idiots past, present, and future. now that's something to look forward to.
i'm 47, and my daughters 18-19yr old friends think i'm a MILF.
so.......................................?????
2007-01-01 04:11:19 · answer #2 · answered by NeverReady 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, some of the longest living persons worked very hard during their lives
2007-01-01 04:04:19 · answer #3 · answered by reckontheirlife 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Worry and fighting are bad but work and exercise are good.
2007-01-01 04:21:53 · answer #4 · answered by Michael M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-01-01 04:08:21 · answer #5 · answered by darkness_angel_09 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋