English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-01 02:13:44 · 30 answers · asked by Plato 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I would also like to add if the Jews were not to blame, or Judas, for betraying Jesus, were they all pawns if he came into the world to atone for all?

2007-01-01 02:41:24 · update #1

30 answers

Jesus did not come into the world to die for us. He came into the world to lead the lost sheep of israel back to the Father.

It was the Jewish religious leaders who felt threatened by Jesus who killed Him.

2007-01-01 02:21:51 · answer #1 · answered by Sldgman 7 · 1 1

Jesus did come into the world to die for us, that is a true statement, but the Jews shouldn't be blamed anyway -
When Jesus was put before the crowd and they asked what to do with Him and the bunch in the crowd yelled "crucify Him!" - that wasn't the Jews, as in the tribe of Judah -

Those folks were Kenites, which fully translated means "sons of Cain" - they were his decendants doing, as usual, the work of their father (small f). Technically, they could legally be called Jews, because they were living in the area of Judea, which legally meant they were "jews" by geographical location only.

Through the years, the Jews have been blamed over and over again for things that the Kenites did.
It is so important to know who the kenites are, that in Rev. God referred to seven churches, and said that he was happy with only two of them: those two churches were the only two who taught their congregation who the Kenites are. So, for a church to be approved by God, it had better be teaching it.
Thats not my word, it is the Word of God, Rev 2:8 and 3:9.

2007-01-01 02:25:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's not a logical thing. In Europe, many people simply wanted a scapegoat for trouble. The Jews were conveniently different-looking, so they were picked on. Calling them "Jesus-killers" was just an excuse to justify bad behavior.

Interestingly, Christians were/are forbidden in the Bible from the practice of usury - basically, lending money at interest. The Jews were not. In Europe, therefore, all the banks were run by Jews because a bank will lose money if it doesn't charge interest. Therefore, the Jewish bankers were needed, but resented.

2007-01-01 02:16:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Jesus was crucified under Roman law. He suffered the fate of many when his seditious activities ended on the cross. The `King of the Jews` failed in his political objectives, but lives on in a false interpretation of history. Judaism is used as a scapegoat , difficult to convince the Roman population that the Jewish rebel they killed, was God. The Romans killed their own (future) deity? Tell you what, BLAME THE JEWS,and give separation between Jesus the JEW who lived,practised,and died for Judaism, and the Christian image we are busy inventing.

2007-01-01 04:11:25 · answer #4 · answered by ED SNOW 6 · 0 0

Christians do not blame the Jews, because Jesus died for the sins of the entire world. He had to be a blood sacrifice because everyone sinned.

2007-01-01 02:29:28 · answer #5 · answered by Born Again Christian 5 · 0 0

Check above: King James' version of the truth etc. Bach (protestant) also has the Jews saying: 'Christ's blood be upon us and upon our children'; in St. Mathew Passion (No. 59 Rez.). I believe Jews were excluded from many work-guilds in medieval Europe. Richard Dawkins: God makes brains that can think and feel and love, out of the carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen gases: good on yer mate, we're getting there.

2007-01-01 03:01:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If they are to blame as others contend, then one thing the Lord taught us is to forgive and if we cannot forgive those that done wrong we do no right ourselves. We may as well say thank you to them, for salvation is of the Jews. John 4 verse 22.

2007-01-01 03:07:58 · answer #7 · answered by Cool Briz 3 · 0 0

i don't BUT it was the Jewish leaders who insisted that he be crusified. The Roman stooge P. Pilot tried to spare him but he was considered a major troublemaker and threat to existing orthodox Jews. That is what I remember reading recently. Jesus really was a nuicance coming into town to the temple kicking over moneychangers tables, preaching reform etc. Reminds me of the Japanese saying: "The nail that sticks up gets hammered down."

2007-01-01 02:22:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Years ago who was it that crucified Jesus? The Jews have been blamed ever since! Which I don't think is right, just blame the ones who did it, not the religion!

2007-01-01 02:18:40 · answer #9 · answered by Gerry 7 · 0 1

people are always looking for somebody to blame, regardless of the situation. Its easier than taking responsibility.
I have always that that was extremely sacreligious to do so, seeing as Jesus was a Jew! Not to mention he was actually killed by the Roman Soldiers.

2007-01-01 02:17:06 · answer #10 · answered by Chrissy 7 · 0 0

People are too ignnorant pointing fingers at others. You are correct, Christ DID come to die for us whether he were to die in Israel in that time period or die in the US in 2007. The same thing wiuld have happened anywhere because it was fulfilling prohecy. People who talk bad about Jews keep forgetting that Jesus was Jewish and that was His people. Of course, He died for everybody. Sometimes, people that sin in the Bible are really fulfilling prophecy, like Judas Iscariot or Herod. It is time to stop playing the blame game amongst ourselves and celebrate that Jesus died for our sins to save us from eternal torture! HURRAY!

2007-01-01 02:20:45 · answer #11 · answered by Walking Contradiction 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers