Architect requires artistic talent in addition to a solid foundation in the sciences. Civil engineering just requires a logical mind in addition to the sciences.
2007-01-01 02:00:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As others have said, the answer depends on your particular talents and where you want to go in your career. You need to be somewhat artsy for architecture school and analytical for engineering training. I had to show my art portfolio when applying to architecture programs. Although I got accepted, I decided to go into engineering instead.
(*) Engineering programs
Engineering programs tend to be more difficult because they are very, very mathematics intensive. As a foundation (freshmen & sophomore years) you can expect to take physics I&II, chemistry I&II, calculus I,II,&III, differential equations, material science, and some other good stuff.
(*) Architecture programs
Lots more art and lots less math. At one of the architecture school that I toured the second year students had just returned from a trip to Turkey and were doing projects that basically looked like an art gallery. I have no idea what that has to do with making a building stand up.
(*) Job prospects
Architects tend to make much less money and live in more expensive areas (i.e. NYC) right out of school but might have the potential to make more money in the long run. The job prospects are much better for a young engineer - more jobs in more places and better pay. In either profession if you want to make big bucks you need to become a partner at a firm or open your own design shop.
(*) Changing professions
Engineers are very widely respected and an engineering degree opens lots of doors to other professions. Although architects are well repsected I'm not sure that an architectural degree opens as many doors as an engineering degree.
I have friends in both professions (including sisters with one in each profession) and I think both can be rewarding so it basically comes down to what you want to do with your life. Your best bet is to talk to as many engineers and architects as you can and find out what they actually do all day.
On final note... architects think they make buildings pretty while engineers make buildings stand up.
2007-01-01 05:07:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some good answers above, but they tend to compare the architect to a 'structural' engineer. However, in my opinion civil engineering is a much broader profession, not just structural. You could be designing deep sea drilling structures, overseeing the construction of a dam, route surveying in Yellowstone (which was very cool), designing subdivisions or interstate highways. Often it is a civil who manages a multi-discipline project like the Central Arizona Project.
Engineering isn't always artsy, yet bridges are designed with asthetics involved. Creativity is necessary in engineering.
One of the neatest things about an engineering degree is learning how things work. Yet I am biased.
2007-01-01 14:32:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by daedgewood 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends on your talent.
if you are good with numbers, and can build something according to a plan, executing it within a time frame and a certain cost, you are better off with an engineer. If you can come up with an innovative design, pleasing to the eye and functional in concept, then you are an architect.
The trick is this: An architect has to dream up what something should look like. The engineer takes the architect's pipe dreams and makes them reality.
So if you see things in the air, draw them on paper. (architect)
If you see the paper, make the paper into an object of steel/concrete/wood/glass/cement (engineer).
Which is better? Whoever can draw the most pleasure out of his profession and still have a life outside of his job to live at home with.
2007-01-01 07:57:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by anon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have been given my B.S. in workstation Egineering usually when you consider that i presumed it had a good destiny. (And it does often) I now am getting my M.S. in Aerospace Engineering - and all i'm able to declare is i like Aerospace whilst positioned next with workstation engineering. i'm a much greater advantageous student and that i'm a lot greater intersted in what i'm analyzing. base line, this is good to contemplate how smart a level is, yet once you're comparing 2 very smart tiers, at that factor it makes a lot greater experience to do what you like greater. As somone who spend 5 years in working in the previous I got here back to get my masters degree - I in no way found out how a lot greater exciting and exciting it might desire to be, doing something you incredibly relish. this is extensive - do not underestimate it. additionally you will do greater advantageous and boost swifter in an profession you incredibly relish, so interior the tip you will in all probability earn greater money too. so which you incredibly could have the appropriate of the two worlds. i opt to advise spending some hours with a working laptop or workstation engineer, and a few with a civil engineer - ask your self, "if i'm doing this something of my existence - what whould I somewhat do". So for what this is nicely worth somewhat stressing approximately stupid info - do what you opt to do.
2016-12-11 20:25:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Architecture, because it requires talent, civil engineers are a dime a dozen.
2007-01-01 01:57:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
civil engineers score jobs. architects score chicks
2007-01-01 01:57:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mardy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
when you envision your life and what you want to build do you see bridges or buildings?if bridges go with civil engineer if buildings go with architect.
2007-01-01 01:59:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends on your bend (abilities and likes). Achitects go for form (leaning toward art) while engineers go for function (science).
2007-01-01 02:02:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by MT C 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
they're like the same thing
2007-01-01 02:03:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋